Re: Roberts

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:33:49 -0400, trudogg <trudogg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>...should be denied if only on the grounds that he was nominated by
>someone totally incapable of that responsibility.

This is a despicable position to advocate. I suppose you want us to
take this as "true liberal" reasoning. This is in the same vein as the
terrorists executing familys for what one of their distant relatives
has done.
--
Mr.E
.

Loading