Parental Alienation

On May 13, 4:17 am, Greegor <greego...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 12, 1:26 pm, childadvocate <smartn...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Facts are true regardless of credentials. What are your credentials
and motivation ?

Bringing in side issues is irrelevant. The discussion is about the
DSM.

You extolled the perfection and authority
of the DSM which is a crock.
APA itself has been forced to acknowledge
various and grievous failings of DSM.

The DSM itself warns against use of DSM
by unqualified people, like you.

Even the APA does not pretend the DSM
is "facts". Your absolutism is exactly
the kind of abuse/misuse they warn against.

It is as if you have turned the DSM
into your "holy writ" or something.

Do you know Diana Napolis personally?
Do you know her?
ARE you Diana Napolis?

How many different nyms do you
use to post these stories?

Do you intend to conceal your ulterior motive?

I'm not concealing my past and my ID.

You are.


On May 13, 1:43 pm, childadvocate <smartn...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I never stated the DSM is perfect, nor have I promoted any
"absolutism."
I stated "The DSM is very helpful in diagnosing and treating those
that suffer from mental illness."
You put words in mouth, debating points I never made.

You said (and I quote, with a LINK) :
--------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/a9ab0bdff4345c4b?hl=en&dmode=source
The DSM is a very well researched book.
Everything in it is backed by solid research.
------------------

You seriously exaggerated it's validity.
APA themselves warn against such BS.

You ad-hommed Wikipedia, actually
and without even citing even one
inaccuracy thereof.

You personalize the argument unnecessarily,
adding untruths and personal attacks.

You hide behind anonymity.
You unrealistically glorified the DSM.
The APA itself warns against the way
that you exaggerated it's scientific basis.

You use various nyms to post news stories
but you are evasive about your sentiments,
purpose or ulterior purpose.

It's clear that you have SOME kind of agenda,
and it closely resembles that of Diana Napolis.

BTW I am not DN.

What is your connection to Diana Napolis?

How exactly did you come to be
involved in this issue?

What kind of education and work
did you train in related to this issue?

How you you explain the nature of your nym "childadvocate"?

Diana Napolis considers herself to be exactly that.
(On her better days.)

So how do you supposedly differ from Diana?

Do you or did you work in any
industry related to this issue?

What is your conflict of interest that
had you exaggerating the validity of DSM?

.

Quantcast