Parental Alienation

From: Greegor <greegor47@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 07:05:58 -0700 (PDT)

On May 12, 12:35 am, childadvocate <smartn...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Any book can be misused. The DSM is very helpful in diagnosing and
treating those that suffer from mental illness.

Without credentials you're just flapping your gums.

It's incredible how you deny issues that
exist even among the qualified people themselves.

What's your TRUE motivation for
acting as a cheerleader on this?

What is your education and field of work, when you do?

Do you know Diana Napolis personally?
How well do you know her?

Do you think her psychiatrists found
the DSM to be very useful?
.

References:
- Brady under pressure as***abuse victims talk of cover-up, The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5
  - From: childadvocate
- Re: Brady under pressure as***abuse victims talk of cover-up, The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5
  - From: childadvocate
- Re: Brady under pressure as***abuse victims talk of cover-up, The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5
  - From: childadvocate
- Re: Brady under pressure as***abuse victims talk of cover-up, The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5
  - From: childadvocate

Prev by Date: For Ultra-Orthodox in Abuse Cases, Prosecutor Has Different Rules
Next by Date: Re: A Tax Story
Previous by thread: Re: Brady under pressure as***abuse victims talk of cover-up, The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5
Next by thread: Re: Brady under pressure as***abuse victims talk of cover-up, The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread