Re: Theories Abound for Nonexistent Effect

alexy <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:4qfi641vvl1ldrngtsoco99vcs310rkra8@
4ax.com:

Deadrat <a@xxxxx> wrote:

Bret Cahill <BretCahill@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:49bb9f56-a93f-4199-8b77-1621ff2a9547@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

A bunch of irrelevance.

The World Fact Book has China's economy growing at 11.4%.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2
003rank.html

Moreover the same source shows that China's is already 1/2 the size of
the zero growth U. S. economy

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2
001rank.html

This means China will have a larger economy than the U. S. by Nov.
2014.

ln(2)/ln(1.114) = 6.4 years

Look up exponential functions and get back to us.


Why? While his implicit and explicit assumptions are laughable, in
this case, he actually got the math right. Must be an accident.

It's no accident. I don't think he's stupid; he's just ignorant. If he
looked up exponential functions, he might find out how useless it is just
to get the math right.
.