California Code section that says the filing date and not the hearing date governs time limits

I know the law used to be that it was the hearing date and that was
changed to be the filing date. For example, if a law says you have 6
months to bring a motion for reconsideration of a prior ruling, but
usually there is like a 3 week delay from filing the motion to the
hearing date, and you file it the day before the six months is up, the
motion is still timely even though the hearing date is after the six
months.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: PRNs WA State Class Action Summary
    ... existing law. ... Following the amendment, Instead of filing a motion to dismiss, the ... court simply order a more definite statement. ... judgment on the Dosing Guidelines. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: PRNs WA State Class Action Summary
    ... existing law. ... Following the amendment, Instead of filing a motion to dismiss, the ... court simply order a more definite statement. ... judgment on the Dosing Guidelines. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: PRNs WA State Class Action Summary
    ... existing law. ... in September they filed a motion to dismiss the ENTIRE ... assert what are called ?affirmative defenses.? ... court simply order a more definite statement. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
    ... > causal mechanism of motion contradicts Newton's 1st Law, ... allows the interpretation with no logical contradiction that no agent causes ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: PRNs WA State Class Action Summary
    ... damned idjits here "running'crap like the "guidelines" are prob. ... existing law. ... Following the amendment, Instead of filing a motion to dismiss, the ... court simply order a more definite statement. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)