Re: Patty did well

In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:10:04 GMT,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The1Source@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
wcrapkin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
wcrapkin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/articles/3241476.html?page=3&c=y

Geragos scored some points so he's probably happy that he accomplished
what he could with her cross. However Hum has to be happy that Geragos
didn't do any major damage to her.

Are you on DRUGS? Geragos DEMOLISHED her. You weren't there, and you
can't know. And Denise Nix is trying furiously to do some CYA for the
_Breeze_, who came out early on the WRONG side of this case.

She was able to respond to Geragos's questions with credible skill.

No she wasn't. She was fumbling for words.

I'd call her testimony a tie.

I'd call you deluded.

During re-direct questioning by Deputy District Attorney Craig Hum, Key-
Marer read from her journal portions in which she and Brown discussed his
agreeing to let her husband adopt Lauren, noting the girl seemed
"settled."

And we have NOTHING but the word of Sarah that Cameron had ever agreed to
allow her husband to adopt Lauren. And, stay tuned. There is BOUND to be
more testimony (from others) about this (and it WON'T support Sarah). The
truth of the matter is that Cameron had NEVER agreed to the adoption.

CaMORON did agree to let Lauren be adopted.

Nope. Never did.

Then why haven't you sought Sarah's arrest, trial and conviction
for perjury?


Will you tell us why he changed his mind?

Never did that either.

Also during questioning by Hum, Key-Marer read additional notations that
showed discord between her and Brown starting around Lauren's fourth
visit with Brown -- mostly about Brown not wanting Lauren to have a
relationship with his own mother.

Oh, you think?

You do not think, Ted.

His mother was right there in court next to us when Sarah said these things.
Her response was "where is she getting this from?" The consensus was that
she was making it up as she went along.

Then the consensus is wrong, since what's been reported is fairly
consistent with her GJ testimony.


And what do you think his mother -- who IS on the witness list -- is going
to say about this?

That CaMORON was a self-centered prick and the world would have been a
better place if his daddy had shot him into the sheets.

So you enjoy trolling on usenet, then?

Key-Marer and Brown argued because she felt it was inappropriate for him
to bad-mouth his mother in front of Lauren since their daughter was
forming a relationship with her, despite Brown's objections to it.

Yeah, that's Sarah's side of the story. Cameron tells it differently.

CaMORON MURDERED Lauren.

Lauren died as the result of a very tragic accident.

It's just a shame the evidence doesn't support this concept.


He is going to lie.

You've already lied.

Has s/he? Can you prove this? Crickets on stand-by.


(She clearly did well.

Not from where I was sitting.

She did well from where I was sitting. Did you notice the person in the
courtroom in the nice suit, giggling from time to time? That was me.

What, you're Jeff Leslie?

Wait a minute! I thought Loretta was the source. Oh wait,
that's right. *I'm* the source.
Are you going to accuse *everyone* of being this person?

So what are you going to do after this case goes
poof on you, after you've spent over a million bucks of county money on it?

I doubt anyone is worried about it. If Cameron is found
not-guilty, he's found not guilty. So long as he gets a fair trial,
no one is going to cry over it.


How the *** did Patty get so fat?

Beats me.

Bar a thyroid condition, she consumed more calories than she
used. It's not a difficult concept.


Has she been stealing your cookies?

No, I've given up cookies.

Geragos tried to paint her as a liar who fabricated these accusations
only after her daughter died.

And he was VERY effective, particularly when he pointed out that there
were some VERY serious charges that Sarah made on the stand on direct
questioning: charges that she had neglected to make at ANY time earlier:
NOT in grand jury testimony, NOT in a deposition in connection with a
civil case in 2001, and that did NOT appear in a VERY detailed journal
that she kept. And she was sheepishly unable to explain why these charges
first came up only upon direct questioning in this case, and there wasn't
ANY earlier record of them before now.

So mother-fucking what?

And here Hum thought that things were going his way when the judge was
overruling all those 1054 objections. So now they come back to bite him.

Do you recall everything that happens in your pathetic excuse for a life at
every moment in your pathetic excuse for a life? *** no!

Sure I do. I have EXCELLENT recall.

Yet I've had to spend time at Google to supply links to posts you
couldn't recall making. Great recall there, Ted...NOT.

One time I got accosted by one of those

Is that where you got the idea to approach the guy from the jury
pool?

people in the mall doing a survey. She showed me a videotape of four TV
commercials back-to-back, and asked me to recount everything I could remember
about them. It took me almost an hour and her 4 full legal pad sheets to
write everything down. My sister (not Patty, another sister) was with me,
and she said, "oh my God, you remember all that?" Because I recounted the
whole commercial for all four of them. I said, "yes". The woman who was
conducting the survey said that I wasn't the typical respondent.

All you can remember is where to buy cookies in bulk.

Nah. Lowrenta does that with Cheez-Its for her young son.

Note, however, that her son isn't fat.


However Hum was able to show that she told the truth,

Yah, right. And I'm the king of England.

Hum was able to show that she told the truth.

Hum's got his Johnson in his hand. And he knows it.

What is it with you and homo-erotic imagery?


I was there. I saw it all.

Only if you're Jeff Leslie.

Given that Det. Leslie is the real power behind the thrown, I'm
sure he's directing the source. Get real, Ted. You've accused nearly
everyone of being the source.


that her problems with Cam began before her daughter died.

Which isn't terribly unusual in child visitation/custody cases like this.

In the end a jury will decide how much weight to give to her claims, but
I wouldn't call her destroyed.

I don't know why not. The whole case is a farce, and it has ALREADY been
shown to be so. And we've just barely gotten underway. In the end, you
will KNOW why I always said that I couldn't see them bringing this dog to
trial.

Ted is suffering from Acid flashbacks.

Nope. I've never dropped acid. Not even once.

He drank it.
Dropping acid means placing it on the tongue. When one drinks
it, in "electric beer," it's not refereed to as dropping acid.
Ted's playing word games here.


He isn't watching the same trial as the rest of the courtroom.

I'm watching the same one that KFI has been reporting on.

They haven't reported in a day or so.


So far, Hum has been kicking Geragos' ass.

Hee hee hee. The look of defeat is palpable in Hum's face.

Hum is already aware of the line of question Geragos will use in
cross.


Her testimony was not a disaster for the prosecution.

In the same way that Watergate wasn't a disaster for Richard Nixon.

I am surprised, Ted. You agree with us that CaMORON is toast,

Nope.

since it was the COVER-UP that was a disaster for Nixon.

And it is the PROSECUTION that has something to cover up.


Such as?

Lauren is not alive so she can't tell us her feelings, but Sarah was able
to show that contrary to Geragos's assertions she did not say one thing
before and one thing now.)

Get real. That happened right with the start of cross. Geragos read a
letter that Sarah had prepared to read (and did so) before the Ranch Palos
Verdes city council immediately after Lauren's death. And in that letter,
it was quite clear that she regarded Lauren's death as an accident.

She was in denial.

Ho, what's this? Spin? She didn't seem to be in too much denial when she
told Cameron to not come to the funeral on the tape.

I think Kent could go into detail about this.

It think that what Kent is about to go into is PRISON, as he is a convicted
burglar.

When am I going to prison? You never did mention when the
mythical sentencing date is going to be.
Let me guess. You're going to claim I'm in prison when we leave
for El Salvador, right? Not to worry. I'll find a way to post from
there so that you'll know I'm not in prison.

--
Kent

Theodore A. Kaldis admits to stalking my wife:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/f1a183a485d58c5d
.

Quantcast