Re: Patty did well

The1Source@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:

I concur.

With BS. (Par for the course with Ken Smith.)

The bull*** was on the part of Geragos.

Au contraire.

Does he really think the jury didn't see his game for what it was? A
desperate attempt to bull*** the jury!

Come on. You weren't even there. I can identify EVERYONE in the gallery.
Where were you?

Where Geragos "scored points," they were for the most part insubstantial.

They were MONUMENTAL.

Hardly, *** face.

They were. If you were there, you would know.

The journal evidence is as it is, and the jury will take it to the bank.
After all, why would a woman lie to her diary?

That's what she wanted the court to believe -- that she lied to her diary
-- because on a number of points her direct testimony was in direct
CONFLICT with what she had written in her diary.

I was there, fat ass.

No you weren't.

I saw what happened.

No you didn't.

I heard what was said. Patty should get ready for a life alone.

Nope. (But Craig Hum might better be concerned about a bar disciplinary
hearing. And it might do Jeff Leslie good to start looking for a new line of
work.)

No one will have her fat ass and she will never have CaMORON again.

More personal invective. Do you have a problem with anger?

He will be in prison for the rest of his life.

Wait until this trial REALLY gets going.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.

Quantcast