Re: Civil Rights Question
- From: "GeekBoy" <nerds@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:09:45 -0700
"Anon E. Moose" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:m3ph92tagvk99gcsf1k902f0kk3hqvcbf3@xxxxxxxxxx
Trying to settle a bet with a buddy...
As I understand "civil rights" in the United states, it is illegal
for, say, a restaurant owner not give service to someone on the basis
of their race.
Is it likewise a violation of "civil rights" in the United States for
a person not to frequent a restaurant on the basis of the owner's
race?
In other words, it would be a violation of a person's civil rights if
a restaurant owner told a black patron, "I don't patronize blacks" and
pointed to the door, no?
Would it likewise be a violation of a restaurant owner's civil rights
if a person told a black restaurant owner, "I don't patronize blacks"
and walked out the door.
If not, why?
Not in the US..just the states. Refusing to serve a person of any color in a
privately owned place has nothing to do with "commerce among the several
states." nor a crime against the US.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Civil Rights Question
- From: Larry
- Re: Civil Rights Question
- References:
- Civil Rights Question
- From: Anon E . Moose
- Civil Rights Question
- Prev by Date: Civil Rights Question
- Next by Date: Re: When is it a 'loophole'?
- Previous by thread: Civil Rights Question
- Next by thread: Re: Civil Rights Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|