Re: Lowrenta Caught Out! Breeze Changes Story!


Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Lowrenta wrote:

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:

[...] she has supplied unsubstantiated and FALSE information to a geniune
reporter (Denise Nix of the Torrance [CA] Daily Breeze) which got printed,
and said reporter has now learned that the information is false. As a
result, Lowrenta will doubtless be under scrutiny.

Absolutely false.

Oh, really? Original Breeze story:

"Besides the scientific evidence, the prosecution will present
evidence to support a motive for murder: That Brown, who sired the
girl out of wedlock, was in dire financial straits and did not want
to continue paying child support, including the nearly $40,000 he
owed."

Where did the "$40,000" figure come from? The ONLY one who has EVER used it
(aside from this instance) was YOU.

AMENDED Breeze story, currently online:

"Besides the scientific evidence, the prosecution will present
evidence to support a motive for murder: That Brown, who sired the
girl out of wedlock, was in dire financial straits and did not want
to continue paying child support, including the nearly $3,401 he
owed."

See: http://tinyurl.com/l3g6w

And there's an interesting story behind the $3,401 (which we won't get into
here). But $3,401 is chump change when you have many times that amount in
liquid assets available to you. (As the prosecutor will soon rudely find
out.)

But the important thing that we should note here is that YOU have been CAUGHT
OUT! Your credibility is SHOT with Denise Nix, and there is NOTHING that you
can do to repair it.

My credibility? Here's my original statement from the blog entry:

Cameronomics: It is possible that Brown was in arrears with his child
support in the neighborhood of $40,000. According to CA child support
law, Brown's obligation began August 1996, the date of Lauren's
birth.

UNQUOTE

Note that I wrote, "It is possible....."

Did I state that as fact? Did Ms. Nix get that figure from me? You will
have to ask her. I never spoke to her, nor have I had any contact with
her, electronically, telephonically, or in person.

You'll have to ask her where she got that figure. I never declared it
as fact. It was my speculation, to which I'm entitled. This issue has
nothing to do with my credibility and everything to do with your desire
to discredit and defame everyone associated with this case who believes
Cam Brown to be guilty.

When you can prove a nexus between me and Ms. Nix, let me know. I'd
like to see how you invent that out of whole cloth like you do
everything else.

Have a nice day. I have to leave for the day.

.