Re: SOME REAL Questions from Palos Verdes




"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LPLFf.13705$fM1.9008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you look at the bottom of the 17 April, 2001 City Council Meeting
minutes (just above the "Recess & Reconvene" heading), found here:

<http://tinyurl.com/cqezy>

you will find the following:

[...snipped irrelevant explorations into confounded bemusements...]

Instead, can we look into the bottom of the matter of exactly how and why
little Lauren Key wound up fatally battered at the bottom of a 120 foot
cliff while under the care of her fathers immediate supervision?

We have plenty of unanswered questions concerning that, and the details of
the how and why's of Cam's prosecution are not in any way lessening the
importance of determining the the amount of culpability of certain of his
actions before and after her death which, if not satisfactorily explained,
weigh heavily against any claims that this was not a coldly calculated and
brutal murder.

Because I brought this question up a few months ago, and it was ignored, I
am going to ask you one important question yet again, and a couple of
related questions, being redundant here merely as an attempt to prevent
another avoidance on your part of this very important consideration:

1.) Exactly what circumstances was it that prevented Cameron from visiting
Sarah in person, or by phone, to offer consolation and share with her the
horrid truth about the "accident?"

2.) Did Sarah have a Protective Order that prevented him from sharing with
her at the funeral? [ Or did something "come up" where he was unable to
attend?]

3.) What circumstances kept Cam, who was financially solvent, from
participating and sharing in funeral arrangements and expenses?

And, for the record, the only relevant question among your personal Palo
Alto Mystery Musings:

4.) Exactly how would a sign posting a warning that IP is dangerous have
prevented Laura's "accidental" death?

Answer these questions reasonably and you will have a much greater effect of
obtaining what you would consider a favorable determination from us than all
the fanciful conspiracy musings of this particular post enhanced three fold.

If you can think of some good ones, you might want to slip your good old
brother-in-law a note and fill him in on your brainstorms...

He might be needing them desperately at some time or another.

*wink*

Hint: Outbursts absent astericks coded jargon and minus meaningless
accusations, innuendo's, and bald-faced allegations, when combined with at
least a vaguely plausible explanation, will be given more wieght than
responses such as the following:


"You don't know what you're talking about. Cameron loved his daughter
DEARLY."

"I would guess that it's because you swallow lies easily."
[Guesses don't count.Conclusions, and even hunches, when based upon
factually presented circumstances that a reasonable and prudent man would
consider as more likely than not support your position, will be given proper
credence.]

"What's a laugh is that you have ABSOLUTELY no idea of what you are
talking about, and yet you presume to talk about this case as if you
actually knew something."

"People in the nuthouse tend to do that [ROFL]for no reason (as you are
now)."

[No supporting detail explaining how this unreferenced bald faced allegation
applies; contradictory with previous BFA, and exhibiting same
characteristics.]

"No, you swallow the lies of others (because I'm not telling any)."
[Details needed for any type of consideration at all.]

And, well, you have the point.

Whether you take advantage of this knowledge or not remains to be seen.

Personally, I wouldn't wager on it.

Suprise me!

--Dane












----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT - a little something for Linus
    ... their bottom line would be loads different. ... But just because some people steal is no reason to think ... Since they are being good stewards of the land, ... Thomas Jefferson - "The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: OT - a little something for Linus
    ... call "socialist" government policies. ... their bottom line would be loads different. ... But just because some people steal is no reason to think ... Since they are being good stewards of the land, ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Disc Brake v.s. Rim Brake
    ... Bottom posting makes sense when you are editing out the content of previous posts, otherwise it doesn't- if you are going to leave the entire thread history in the post you might as well top post. ... It results in informational hash rather than an intelligent and effective conversation. ... and reasoning skills is no reason to change best practices. ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Re: NW_Pilots Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...
    ... Bottom line is ... ferry tanks are are NOT UNCOMMON and this is a foreseable modification. ... a faulty fuel gauge for whatever reason should never ever cause your whole damn flight instrumentation and display to crash and reboot. ... Go ahead and blame Garmin but don't use this failure as a reason not to have advanced avionics in aircraft. ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)