Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: "RetzQ2" <lmds@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2005 20:19:00 -0700
Kent Wills wrote:
>
> An interesting claim. Is there any verifiable evidence to
> support it?
>
> >
> >You could have added that she told private things she knew about MsP,
> >after she learned she was posting here. ANOTHER BREACH OF TRUST AND
> >PRIVACY.
>
> An interesting claim. Is there any verifiable evidence to
> support it?
No. Yolonda posted all of her own sordid history on her blog. I didn't
have to post a thing about her. She is a nutcase, and everyone who read
her blog left in droves before six months. She had a big argument with
someone over the Terri Shiavo case (a couple of years ago, the first
time they disconnected the feeding tube) and shut down her blog in
disgust. It had nothing, whatsoever, to do with me. I was knee-deep in
the Peterson case and had no time for Yoyo.
> >
> >You absolutely should have included her public posting of not only her
> >husband's private emails but also those from a woman emailing him. She
> >posted them so her readers could laugh at both of them. Neither knew
> >she was doing it so of course they had not given permission. She had
> >hacked her husband's account. He may have deserved it, maybe. The woman
> >did not. ANOTHER BREACH OF PRIVACY.
> >
>
> An interesting claim. Is there any verifiable evidence to
> support it?
NO. The back story about Ms. P was posted on a private blog that was
infiltrated by JA and her ilk and JA kept all the posts for posterity
in her "400 page" document she thinks is some kind of incriminating
information about me and my posters. Who is the weirdo, here? EH?
> It won't happen. Unlike you, I don't have a need to become
> argumentative with Loretta. Yes, I'll berate her when warranted, just
> as I do with you. You'll note she didn't, and presumably doesn't,
> have a problem with it. It's called maturity.
(....)
> because Loretta and I have respect for each other.
> You should try respecting people once in a while. You'll find
> it can do wonders.
>
I have personal information, pictures, addresses, email addresses,
phone numbers and other data from dozens of people I have corresponded
with and met over the years I've had the blog. Nobody is worried about
me. The only people I have exposed are people who blatantly attacked
me.
They have no right to blatantly attack, vilify me, cast aspersions,
level accusations of criminal wrongdoing, or post pictures of my kids
or maps to my home under the cloak of anonymity. When I discover who
they are - they are exposed.
They are much less likely to do these things out in the open.
I don't post anonymously and never have. If my 6 detractors (.0009% of
my readership) want to bash me anonymously, they had better watch what
they do. They are not anonymous, really.
JA is barking up the wrong tree. I can only imagine she has nothing
else meaningful in her life in order to spend 24/7 posting here or at
the bog to ridicule and malign me.
It's extremely depraved.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: GIorydays
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- References:
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: GoodKarma
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: GoodKarma
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: GoodKarma
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: GoodKarma
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: RetzQ2
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- From: Just Amazed
- Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- Prev by Date: Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- Next by Date: Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- Previous by thread: Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- Next by thread: Re: Snip~ I do wish that the scum of New Orleans had all
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
