Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: toto <scarecrow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:23:06 GMT
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:34:33 -0400, Ericka Kammerer <eek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Caledonia wrote:No one proposed mandatory K back in the old days, but some states have
I believe that the Clinton plan is proposed for similar reasons --
the alternatives that many kids have are not as great as a high-
quality preschool.
And not only that, but as far as I'm aware, no one
seriously promoting universal access to pre-k is suggesting
mandatory pre-k. Those who prefer to keep kids at home
would be free to do so.
passed that into law. I think it should not be.
Best wishes,
Ericka
--
Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: Ericka Kammerer
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- References:
- challenging an intelligent child
- From: janesire
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: Chookie
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: janesire
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: janesire
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: Donna Metler
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: Caledonia
- Re: challenging an intelligent child
- From: Ericka Kammerer
- challenging an intelligent child
- Prev by Date: Re: challenging an intelligent child
- Next by Date: Re: challenging an intelligent child
- Previous by thread: Re: challenging an intelligent child
- Next by thread: Re: challenging an intelligent child
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|