Re: Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- From: "Tori M" <jeffandtori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:09:27 -0500
I dont know. I dont see where the state had the right to be involved at
all. I think many people are getting involved in stuff like this that
really should be decided between a family and their dr. It is a persons
right to get a new care provider if they dont like the options given by the
first.
Tori
"Cathy Weeks" <kathyspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155831759.318229.92320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/08/16/cancer.teen.ap/index.html
A 16-year-old boy was diagnosed with Hodgkins's Lymphoma, and he
underwent a 3-month round of chemo, and it left him terribly
debilitated. (He was over 6 foot tall, and so skinny and weak that his
father had to carry him from the car to his bed). So when his cancer
returned, he wanted to pursue alternative therapies, and skip the
chemo.
His parents supported him in his decision, and when they left the
hospital, a social worker turned them in. A court ruled his parents
negligent and ordered him to report for chemo. A higher judge stayed
that order, and set a new trial, which he has just won. The new trial
declared that his parents had never been negligent (he had been seeing
doctors, and seeking treatment in mexico, eating a sugar-free, organic
diet, and taking herbal remedies). Under the new ruling, he may pick
any board-certified oncologist experienced in radiation treatments and
friendly to alternative therapies, and as long as he stays under that
doctor's care (and that might include radiation) and submits 3-months
updates as to his care and how he is doing, until he is considered
cured, or he turns 18, whichever comes first.
I personally think a 16-year-old is old enough to make a decision like
that. I also wondered how the courts would enforce his chemo - handcuff
him to his hospital bed, and drug him until they got the needle into
him?
I know that *in general* I personally don't hold a lot of faith in most
alternative treatments, or at least not by themselves (I suspect that
guided imagery and hypnosis were key to my father's survival from
Esophageal Cancer, but I doubt they would have done it alone).
However, I am unsure when I would back off and allow a child to make a
decision to refuse treatment. I wouldn't give a young child that option
- they just don't have the understanding to make that kind of decision.
But I think your average 16-year-old does. 16-year-old murderers are
tried as adults, and 17-year-olds can enlist in the Army. 16-year-olds
can have babies, and rarely does anyone try to take custody of the baby
away merely due to the parent's age.
Anyway, I'm hoping for a good and rousing (and friendly) debate on the
issue.
So what are your thoughts?
Cathy Weeks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- From: Jeff
- Re: Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- From: Cathy Weeks
- Re: Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- References:
- Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- From: Cathy Weeks
- Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- Prev by Date: Re: Child runs away
- Next by Date: Re: Child runs away
- Previous by thread: Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- Next by thread: Re: Curious what others think - 16-year-old refuses chemo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|