Re: Daughter Is Way Too Protective of Son
- From: "bizby40" <bizby40@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:33:23 -0400
"Banty" <Banty_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dc1mi801so2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <1122255780.253756.91280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> What teenager?? Is this a K through 12 school? Are you referring to the
> teenager who attacked him earlier? And this stuff about testicles is
> beyond
> weird. You know in such detail about this? Woudn't there be criminal and
> civil
> actions concerning this??
>
> This isn't adding up and is starting to strain credulity.
I think the teen was supposed to be the big brother of
another pre-schooler. Still, I don't see how that teen
and her daughter would be there at the school without
their parents present.
I agree that it doesn't add up. As soon as she said
that her daughter attacked this boy to the extent
that both testicles are permanently damaged (she's
saying her daughter attacked this boy enough to
make him sterile?!!!) I decided that this isn't on
the up and up. If this were true, her daughter
would be facing criminal charges and would likely
be in a psychiatric ward at this point.
Bizby
.
- References:
- Re: Daughter Is Way Too Protective of Son
- From: christene_choi
- Re: Daughter Is Way Too Protective of Son
- From: Banty
- Re: Daughter Is Way Too Protective of Son
- Prev by Date: Re: Update: Dinosaurs *rant only*
- Next by Date: Re: Helmets for walking babies
- Previous by thread: Re: Daughter Is Way Too Protective of Son
- Next by thread: Re: Daughter Is Way Too Protective of Son
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|