Re: Magical StrategyDesk formula

On Nov 10, 2:35 am, "Bill Reid" <hormelf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<khaled...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:3a62dc3d-53d3-48a4-9994-b222738a65ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The strategy is actually tested on data starting from 2001, and it's
still highly successful.

Ah, yes, but not as "successful" apparently as testing from 2004,
or you would have posted THOSE results...  

You can see the results for yourself in the coming days.

Results (whatever those are) or "signals" or the "strategy" itself?  

I can test it myself on my own historical database going back to
the 1800s...hell, you might try just testing on the NASDAQ since
inception (up about 17-fold from its initial value of 100 in 1971), and
use that as your comparison benchmark...then try it on the SP500,
DJIA etc. since inception...  

Who knows, maybe perpetual motion HAS been acheived...  

---
William Ernest Reid
Post count:  1312

This is for you William

From Jan. 2001 Up to now,

If I start with $25,000 , It should be today 18,258,720

P/L% : 73032%

Number of winners: 266
Numbers of losers: 56
% winners : 83%
Profit Factor: 2.79
Max. Consec. Winners: 20
Max. Consec. Losers: 2

I'm going to upload the 2001-2008 chart in my stupid blog!

.

Relevant Pages