Re: still top pick

Its determined by AI and deemed irrelevant by AI?
Perahps the real I is missing?


"tf" <tf@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:VO0jf.13065$F73.10979@xxxxxxxxxxx
> the scores are only relevent when compared with many others I ahve and
after
> watching scores for a year, so how can I explain other than to say it's
> extremnely high.
>
> it's score by AI using criteria that is deemed relevent by AI
>
>
> "ynotssor" <ynotssor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3v3hevF13pd5cU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > "tf" <tf@xxxxxx> wrote in message Y50jf.1437$3x2.466@trnddc07">news:Y50jf.1437$3x2.466@trnddc07
> >
> >>> What is the range of possible "Score" please, and what is the
> >>> significance?
> >>
> >> scores are relevent to all the rest of my proprietary picks, so
> >> virtually meaningless to anyone else.
> >> Though the score is at the high end of usual.
> >
> > Well, the question seemed simple enough to get a clear answer ...
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: still top pick
    ... the scores are only relevent when compared with many others I ahve and after ... watching scores for a year, so how can I explain other than to say it's ... extremnely high. ... it's score by AI using criteria that is deemed relevent by AI ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • Re: Wibbleworld FAQ old site is backup at http://comps.org/wibbleworld/index.html
    ... With apologies to Wibble for it being missing so long. ... Only the FAQ is still relevent I hope! ...
    (uk.rec.competitions)