Re: Stocks I'm Watching for Wednesday


"ynotssor" <ynotssor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3lfo20F12a5suU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "jonathan" <write@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uHxIe.12191$BA5.9181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > I'm rather proud that I've managed to come up with
> > the equation for finding chart behavior where volatility
> > and predictability converge to simultaneous maximums.
> >
> > The formula is as follows. However, I'm not going
> > to interpret it into plain English.
> >
> > This ideal dynamic state is found when all the primary
> > driving forces display edge of chaos or self organized
> > criticality...called Kcrit. It's the abstract dynamic state
> > that stands between chaotic and static attractor basins.
> > It's neither and both at the same time, chaos with order.
> > It's cloud, an emotion or those ethereal 'market forces'.
> > Some call it dark energy.
>
> Sounds like just an excusatory way of attempting to pick tops and bottoms.
> Old stuff with a new facade.


It is old stuff. It's just that this form allows universal application.
It works equally well in any discipline at all. I'm finding stock
charts are a rather simple application as the important info
is already laid out nice and neat on a two dimensional chart.

Another advantage is that this concept seeks uncertainty as
a path to certainty. All those company/industry details are
certainties of sorts. So they are irrelevant.

But I have greater ambitions with these ideas. I have a couple
of years to figure out how to create my own 'pump and dump'
disturbance during the 08 Beijing Olympics.

If successful, one well-timed 'play' will bring freedom to
a fourth of the world.



http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/Mexico_1968.htm

http://en.beijing-2008.org/

http://www.faluninfo.net/




Changing the World through car-bombs or Live 8?


Terrorism is an attempt to maximize the effect of a small disturbance
through uncertainty. By the grace of God we reply. So each attack
is felt by all and at once. The fear of randomness creates
the kind of massive parallel connectivity we see growing on the internet.
This allows a small disturbance to cascade, to have a large
non-linear effect throughout.

Optimizing uncertainty is the weapon of our enemies.

But this most complex realm is where nature and evolution
resides. Randomness and uncertainty are the primary
forces for self organization and life. Which is why
objective science cannot see the true beauty of nature
or the simplicity of creation. Modern Science can't fathom
reality since it seeks out and specializes in certainty.
The opposite of Nature.

Our enemies are attempting to evoke the Power of Nature to defeat us.

But these fundamentalists have ironically made the most basic mistake
of all. They are attacking democracies which closely mimic nature, and
have all the same resilience and adaptability of a highly evolved system.
Their attacks are quickly absorbed and we even thrive off them.

But if the tables are turned and we apply the power of nature
against them, would that succeed?

The rigid dictatorial structures preferred by our enemies resist
such small non-linear attacks easily. They are designed specifically
to survive individual disturbances especially from within by isolating
system components from each other.
But rigid structures are also very brittle, they will resist only up
to a point, then shatter completely. We've all seen this with our
own eyes.

So a small non-linear attack would have to be applied to our
enemies at a critical point where the massive parallel connectivity
can be restored. So the disturbance would be felt by all at once.

If such a critical point could be found, a dictatorship of any kind
would be helpless to survive.

We've witnessed such non-linear attacks. The Janet and Justin scandal
at the Super Bowl is a textbook example of this kind of activism.
A highly censored and rigid 'network' at it's most critical point
attacked by a symbolic act. The entire system trembled at once
creating maximum uncertainty. Creating a life of it's own.
It self-organized and evolved.

The Kathy-Lee sweatshop scandal was another.
In both, the rigid context was ideal, both found the system
critical points, and both used the perfect symbolism.

The symbolism used must also follow the teachings of nature, to
optimize uncertainty. Was the act by Janet and Justin vulgar
and opportunistic, or was it an expression of freedom and beauty?
Was it good or evil? Was Kathy-Lee a person that loves children
or exploits them? Which is it? As with Dante's Inferno the symbolic
scaffold must be stretched to the opposite extremes of heaven and hell
to allow the greatest emotional impact.

The impact forces the system to evolve.

And once initiated the system is pushed into the hands of
Mother Nature. Although we cannot know the direct effects
we can have complete faith in the ultimate outcome.
The system evolves, if it's natural...a democracy.
If a dictatorship the system breaks and is destroyed.

I submit that we now have the mathematics of nature needed to
harness Her forces. And that we now have the tools of
connectivity, literally at our fingertips, that allow us
to apply the Power of Nature ...at will.


As if we were Gods.


An experiment to test these concepts would seem to be in order.
So to give this experiment the best chance of success I should choose
the easiest and most vulnerable system I can find. One that is primed
and ready for this non-linear war of words, music and poets.

Looking around I believe I've found one that appears custom
made. A system that is exceptionally rigid and brittle, and also
is exposed to a very sensitive critical point in the near future
where the needed connectivity can be restored.

My little experiment will be designed to produce results
in and around the 2008 Beijing Olympics. China is the most rigid
system the world has to offer. The largest system the world
has to offer. The most sensitive system the world has
to offer, as this Champagne Event is meant to legitimize the PRC
and secure their future.

A rigid system ...all eyes..will be connected to at once.
This is an opportunity to restore the massive parallel connectivity
that would resonate throughout the entire country at once.
In a democracy, such a cascading disturbance forced the
system to evolve, but a rigid system would instantly shatter.

This world is planning a Grand Gala to consummate the indefinite
enslavement of /one fourth/ of the human race. These Olympics
will be Celebrating the Rape of the natural world.
Even the timeless patience of Mother Nature will be tested
beyond Her limits in such a dark arena.

She will intervene.

Merely placing some appropriate imagery of their own destruction
in the minds of these twelve people should suffice.
http://www.cecc.gov/pages/virtualAcad/gov/stateleaders.php

Their own paranoia and fear of uncertainty will do the rest.

I wish to see the triumph of democracy.
So the world can be returned to Nature.


Jonathan



singin'



"So, so you think you can tell Heaven from Hell,
blue skies from pain.
Can you tell a green field
from a cold steel rail?
A smile from a veil?
Do you think you can tell?"

"And did they get you trade your heroes for ghosts?
Hot ashes for trees?
Hot air for a cool breeze?
Cold comfort for change?
And did you exchange
a walk-on part in the war
for a lead role in a cage"


Pink Floyd
By David Gilmour and Roger Waters
http://music.channel.aol.com/live_8_concert/london_philly_toronto.adp



s



































>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Terrorism vs. the "Comfortably Numb"
    ... Optimizing uncertainty is the weapon of our enemies. ... But this most complex realm is where nature and evolution ... Their attacks are quickly absorbed and we even thrive off them. ... But rigid structures are also very brittle, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: OT New York Times Says It Violated Policies Over MoveOn Ad
    ... The times apparently reserves the right to make "attacks of a personal ... New York Times Says It Violated Policies Over MoveOn Ad ... the paper's public editor wrote yesterday. ... "attacks of a personal nature," Hoyt reported. ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)
  • Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
    ... If you want to think of them as such, you need to realize that nature has no need to do things in a way you feel comfortable discussing in terms familiar to YOU. ... uncertainty in the energy levels, and consequently in the energy and frequency of the emitted photon. ... Heisenberg's uncertainty principle implies that the linewidth of a transition from atomic state A to state B is related to their lifetimes -- longer lifetimes implies narrower linewidth; a "perfectly narrow" linewidth requires an "infinitely long" lifetime, and it will never emit any photons. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)