Re: netiquette - naked symbols, naked links
- From: "karl" <kona_cc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:36:03 -0400
"PeterL" <po.ning@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122052267.174281.303160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> karl wrote:
>> Maybe it's just me but these things bother me.
>>
>> Someone posts a 3 or 4 letter ticker symbol looking to discuss it. Why
>> not
>> post at least the company name and a few bare bones points to discuss -
>> especially for lesser known stocks?
>
> Because if you don't know the symbol, it's highly likely that you don't
> know anything about the stock, and therefore have nothing to contribute
> to the discussion.
So you discount any more generalized information as not being worth
anything? Someone may have some knowledge of the sector or see something in
the particulars that you might not have.
.
- References:
- netiquette - naked symbols, naked links
- From: karl
- Re: netiquette - naked symbols, naked links
- From: PeterL
- netiquette - naked symbols, naked links
- Prev by Date: Swing Trading Stock Picks for 7/25/2005
- Next by Date: Re: MUSLIMS TO NUKE USA IN AUGUST 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: netiquette - naked symbols, naked links
- Next by thread: Re: netiquette - naked symbols, naked links
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
