Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: carole <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 13:13:12 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 7, 11:36 am, Bob Officer <-*-*.@.*-*-> wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:01:09 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
carole <hubbca2...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:26 am, Bob Officer <-*-*.@.*-*-> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:58:31 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
carole <hubbca2...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Sorry mate, you couldn't follow a line of thought through to
resolution if your life depended on it. You have acquired the habit of
dishonesty and weiseling.
Weisel?
http://translate.google.com/?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...weisel
or
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Weisel
Actually when I go back and look at baten's original response (2nd
post in thread) - I'm not even sure what he's saying or who's side he
is supporting,
You can't. I have no problem. are you sure you are reading in
context. I suspect you are not a context reader and do no really
understand why paragraphs or Essays are construct in certain ways.
<quote>
Carole, the above indicates that it is they who are redefining the
original meaning of the word. Not the other way around.
</unquote>
So maybe I'm getting myself worked up into a tizz unnecessarily.
I don't even know what he's saying.
When people reply to posts by saying such things as "they got it
wrong, it was the other way around", and this quote is repeated
throughout a thread, you need to go back to the original to see what
they are replying to. It could mean anything.
You don't? Well that is the not new.
You don't know what you're talking about, merely repeating mantras and
dogma from current scientific theories ie preconceptions and bias.
So its all baten's fault for not making it clear who he thinks is
redefining the word toxemia.
Why is it anyone's fault other then yours?
1. you're the one with poor memory
2.you're the one which has trouble reading and understand what is
written within the context of the essay.
3. you're the one that Can not tell if something is supported by
evidence or if it is hear-say or Mere-say-so.
4. You often post about stuff which you are totally clueless about
and you lack the skills more often than not to understand what is
being discussed.
5. You're the one that skips over technical discussions and numbers
because it is difficult for you or you just decide it isn't in
layman's term so you skip it.
Its all baten's fault because he said "they got it wrong, its round
the other way" and created confusion.
--
Carole
www.conspiracee.com
"A good conspiracy is an unprovable one. If you can prove it,
somebody has screwed up." —Mel Gibson character in 'Conspiracy Theory'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: D Baten
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- References:
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: D Baten
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: carole
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: D Baten
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: carole
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: D Baten
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: carole
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- From: carole
- Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- Prev by Date: Re: This just in:Wakefield Fraud
- Next by Date: Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- Previous by thread: Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- Next by thread: Re: Toxemia - the root cause of disease
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|