Re: effectiveness
- From: Mark Probert-Drew <mark.probert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 22, 1:46 pm, Citizen Jimserac <jimse...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 22, 12:44 pm, Steelclaws <tenquidn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 22, 1:58 pm, David <m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quite a bit of difference between science-based medicine and
"alternative medicine", but then, you would not understand such
things. For example, Testis cancer survival rate is currently 95%
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/survival/latestrates/
Weedheads cannot present any such number for their cancer "cures". If
you can, then show me otherwise.
Oh yes, cut them off, great "cure".
I can understand why you'd prefer to have yours and die than lose them
and live. Normally, though, the cancer is only in one of them and only
that one is removed.
So how about some PROPER follow-up data on 5 year survival on
"alternative" cancer cures? If you can find any, that is.
Ooops, that's the "science" they would care to NOT discuss !!!
Peter Moran discussed it, and showed how the 5 year survival has
increased.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: effectiveness
- From: David
- Re: effectiveness
- References:
- effectiveness
- From: David
- Re: effectiveness
- From: The One True Zhen Jue
- Re: effectiveness
- From: David
- Re: effectiveness
- From: Martin
- Re: effectiveness
- From: carole
- Re: effectiveness
- From: Martin
- Re: effectiveness
- From: carole
- Re: effectiveness
- From: David
- Re: effectiveness
- From: Steelclaws
- Re: effectiveness
- From: David
- Re: effectiveness
- From: Steelclaws
- Re: effectiveness
- From: David
- Re: effectiveness
- From: Steelclaws
- Re: effectiveness
- From: Citizen Jimserac
- effectiveness
- Prev by Date: Re: effectiveness
- Next by Date: Re: effectiveness
- Previous by thread: Re: effectiveness
- Next by thread: Re: effectiveness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|