Re: Martin Rady cannot run from what he posted


"Mark Probert-Drew" <mark.probert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:76eeb7a9-9f94-4d02-a9d9-c75f4ab774b4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jan posts articles that are not scientific and do not support her
position. When she posts a science based article, like the one about
RotaTEQ, it supports the use of the vaccine, and she then denies it.
The articles she does understand use conspiracy bullshit to support
her position. Nothing more.

I understand the problems you suggest with the articles she does
post or her interpretation of the same.

Her use of conspiracy theory can certainly be exasperating.
I prefer to read it as her way of suggesting that the side opposing
her views is overwhemingly well-monied and powerful.

My point is simply that she makes at attempt at providing proof.
Not accepting it as legitimate proof is your prerogative.
But her attempts are far more than can be said about
a certain other blowhard in this ng.


.

Relevant Pages