Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Kevysmom <kevysmom09@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:18:47 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 20, 10:39 am, Lefty <Jusle...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kevysmom wrote:
On Feb 20, 2:34 am, Lefty <Jusle...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kevysmom wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:00 pm, Lefty <Jusle...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:You start with whoever you wish. It has been tried with greater and
Peter B wrote:who should we start with JEWS?
"Lefty" <Jusle...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageA question could be, why do you think it is the wisest choice? I have
news:u7mdna_l69b3PuPWnZ2dnUVZ_vRi4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peter B wrote:Why don't you think things through before you present ignorant options?
"Kevysmom" <kevysmo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageSo, what do you think about vaccination by being exposed to the real
news:d9c3cfc3-889e-41c6-976d-b5b4cb0299d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 18, 7:14 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Feb 18, 7:04 pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Sanitation and hand washing and anti-biotics
On Feb 18, 8:23 am, Bob Officer <boboffic...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:In 1900, about a third of the deaths were from pneumonia,
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=3904I know there are statistics showing that people died young, But if
Doctor Amy Tutuer Hits the nail on the head when it comes to
folk/altie idea that the good old days were so great.
Even giving alt/folk medicine a false myth on wishful thinking,
next
time you walk down the street and see anyone over age 50 (the
average
age in 1900 was 35) and if the alties had their way that 50 year
old
wouldn't be.
I understand if medicine existed the way Jan and other want it to
be
Jan would have been dead long ago.
Here is to science based medicine. If you are over 35, thank a
doctor
of medicine and science.
--
Bob Officer
Posting the truthhttp://www.skeptics.com.au
you
research for yourself at the age people actually died
in the 1800 early 1900's it doesnt add up, the people are MUCH
older!!! I think statistics are WRONG!
Percy Hetherington Fitzgerald (1834 - 1925) He was 91 years old
when
he died back in the early 1900's!
Sir Henry Irving (6 February 1838 - 13 October 1905), He was 67
years
old when he did
Sir Charles Wyndham (23 March 1837 - January 12, 1919) 82 years old
when he died
Dame Ellen Terry, GBE (27 February 1847[1] - 21 July 1928) 81 years
old when she died
Robert Wilks (c. 1665 - September 27, 1732) <---Notice the date...
he
died at age 67
Jonathan Swift (30 November 1667 - 19 October 1745) 78 years old
when
he died
I find it very odd that the avearge death rate was 35 in the 1900's
It
doesnt add up- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
tuberculosis, and diarrhea. Smallpox, measles & polio killed
thousands, too. Thankfully, we now have vaccines for 5 of those 6.
Medicine has made great strides in the past 110 years. You should be
thankful instead of hateful, ungrateful, and disaffected.- Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
===================================================
If one lived in a sterile environment for long then they would become
susceptible to many diseases. They would die easier without immunity
unless vaccinated.
Look at the Eskimo who died from simple colds simply because they had
no immunity to them.
thing? instead of injecting, why not just expose everyone? Would go a
long way towards cleaning up the gene pool. The weak would just die
off. Oh, but that would be as nature intended it, can't have that! I
ask, why not?
Lots of people develop natural immunity to what they come into contact
with, mothers pass it on via breast milk. Vaccines are nice shortcuts
and very needed for large or high density populations.
Disease can spread like wild fire, many can die or be injured like in
the Frisco fire. One makes the wisest choice they can.
read where some want to reduce the population. Are they wise or smart?
We can debate whether they are good or evil later.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
lesser degree of success. I will watch from a distance.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
your post is disgusting! you are either drunk or plain crazy
Please explain what about it is disgusting.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Lets start from the begining
Your words!
"Would go a
long way towards cleaning up the gene pool. The weak would just die
off. Oh, but that would be as nature intended it, can't have that! I
ask, why not? "
My words:
"who should we start with JEWS?"
Your words:
" You start with whoever you wish. It has been tried with greater
and
lesser degree of success. I will watch from a distance"
What dont you see wrong with your words? Its callous!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Lefty
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- References:
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Kevysmom
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: The One True Zhen Jue
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Kevysmom
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Peter B
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Lefty
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Peter B
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Lefty
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Kevysmom
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Lefty
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Kevysmom
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- From: Lefty
- Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- Prev by Date: Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- Next by Date: Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- Previous by thread: Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- Next by thread: Re: The good old day weren't so good.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|