Re: Fear of Nano chemicals is for bozo's, old ladies, idiot rednecks and Peter the Original Butthead


"PeterB - Original" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c2abc456-7ff3-4132-91d1-faacb6a45fbb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 13, 12:43 am, "Peter B" <origin...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tattoo pigment granules are composed of 3 kinds of loosely packed
particles, ranging from 2-400 nm in diameter. The most common particle
size is 40 nm, a particle size of 2-4 nm is less common (slightly more
electron dense), and a particle size of 400 nm is least common (very
electron dense with a crystalline structure). A study of freshly
implanted eyeliner tattoo ink revealed a particle size in the
extracellular matrix of 0.1-1.0 µm, although the average particle size
in the pigment vial prior to implantation was 0.25 µm.2

Once again you are promoting something based on your ignorant and
uninformed opinion. This from Mayo Clinic's website:
===================================================
Where did I promote?

You do a great job of projecting your bias's here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Tattoo inks... are not regulated OR APPROVED by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). The pigments and dyes used in tattoo inks aren't
approved for injection under the skin. LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF THESE ARE
UNKNOWN." [bold added for emphasis]
======================================================
You react like an unlearned prejudiced fool and find information that is
useless to anyone.

The point, dummy, is that your fearmongering of nano chemicals is
irrational. This was only one of hundreds of examples that can be used
to show where nano based chemicals or other materials are in use without
any known detriment. You run out of fear of the unknown, similar to
those in the early days of automobiles that were certain you would get a
nose bleed if you went too fast.



.

Relevant Pages