Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Mark Probert <mark.probert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:39:25 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 15, 12:30 am, Tim Bolen <jurim...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 12:58 pm, Martin <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:33:38 -0800 (PST), Tim Bolen
<jurim...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 13, 11:19 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tim Bolen <jurim...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(3) The third titled “Suzanne Somers's Cancer Book "Knockout"
Soars to Number One on New York Times Best Seller List...” is pretty
self-explanatory with some details about the book. You’ll love the
story about why Suzanne wrote this one.
You didn't answer my email, Tim, so here it is again:
Hello Tim,
I see from your newsletter and web site that you now believe that
Suzanne Somers has revealed "REAL treatments, ones that actually work,
for cancer". Does this mean that you have finally woken up to the fact
that your best friend Hulda Clark didn't really have "The Cure For All
Cancers" or does it mean that you are just opportunistically jumping
on the next bandwagon to come along? Still, seven weeks was long
enough to grieve over Hulda's death before moving on, and with her
gone you need another trough to feed at.
I have a couple more questions for you while I have the emailer out.
Was it difficult getting approval from the authorities for the release
of toxic waste so that the charred remains of the dead Hulda could be
dumped into the ocean?
How is your lawsuit against Google, Webring and Wikipedia going? It's
coming up to two years now (708 days, actually) since you told me that
I was to be engulfed in the legal tsunami involving these
organisations and the quackbuster conspiracy. The head of the
RatbagsDotCom legal support team at Farr, Gough and Dye has been
nagging me about this because she needs to work on budgeting and
staffing for next year
(4) The fourth titled “Truehope Raids Health Canada…” is about one of
the most important cases effecting health care issues in North
America. Here, a supplement company is trying to pull out Health
Canada’s regulatory teeth with a simple Constitutional challenge to
the laws Health Canada uses to raid companies and shut them down. They
are going to win.
I'm not surprised that you are supporting this pack of thieves, Tim.
People selling grass clippings to cure psychiatric disorders fit in so
well with the patient-molesting dentists, the insurance fraudsters and
the cancer quacks that you usually hang around with.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraudhttp://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
poor peter:
I was hoping you'd pop up. I needed a laugh.
It must really frost your ass that the world of real people has come
around to the realization that Western Medicine is total bullshit. My
friend Suzanne is just one of those,
You forgot to add "new" friend, as opposed to your old friend Hulda.
Apparently, you now agree that Hulda was a fraud, since you claim that
Sommers has the 'real' cure(s) for cancer in her book, and it ain't
Hulda's zapper.
BTW, is she aware that she is your 'friend'? Just asking.
constantly in the world media,
But in zero science publications. Why?
Oh, and I have been reading her interviews and she never seems to
mention that she has a friend called Tim Bolen, who will help her
reach "millions of health freedom fighters'. I wonder why?
that is sounding off publicly about the reality of conventional health
care.
You mean when she promotes the Gonzalez protocol,
But Suzanne is not alone. These days, in California, which leads the
world these days in reality thinking, one celebrity after another is
stepping up, doing their social responsibility thing. There's
comedian Bill Maher stomping on the FAKE H1N1 pandemic. The list goes
on and on.
An F-list actress with no career, a comedian.... any science anywhere
Timmy?
I was watching Suzanne being interviewed on the Today show a few weeks
ago, and when she pointed out that it was common knowledge that
chemotherapy had no effect on pancreatic cancer
Besides keeping people very much longer alive then the Gonzalez
protocol she promotes, but hey, when you're on a roll, who cares about
the truth?
- her interviewer Kathy Lee Gifford interrupts and says "and it has all those side
effects." Suzanne was, of course, talking about the unnecessary death
of Patrick Swayze.
Oh yes, the abuse of the dead. The three of you know no shame. I'm not
surprised in your case, you don't even know your own address!
I'll bet that, at that moment, the entire cancer industry shit their pants - as well they should.
That's your wet dream Timmy, not reality.
Much more is coming.
And, as usual, peter, you don't get much of anything right. However,
your sense of total failure about your efforts does come through in
your writing. In that area you are correct.
Amused in California...
Where in Cali Timmy? You remember yet? Or are you still not taking any
ginseng?
Tim Bolen
martin:
If you'd like to forward, through me, your full name and address I'll
hand them to Nick Gonzalez's attorney. I'm sure he'd like to know
that his client's protocol has as you say "that has been shown beyond
a shadow of a doubt to not be just ineffective but actively harmful to
patients?" You would be offered the opportunity, I'm sure, to prove
your claim.
Amused in Califonia...
Yes, Timmie, quackery amuses you. Here is the evidence that you have
no clue about:
http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/JCO.2009.22.8429v1
JCO Early Release, published online ahead of print Aug 17 2009
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8429
Received March 6, 2009
Accepted May 7, 2009
Pancreatic Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy Compared With Gemcitabine-Based
Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer John A. Chabot,
Wei-Yann Tsai, Robert L. Fine, Chunxia Chen, Carolyn K. Kumah, Karen
A. Antman, and Victor R. Grann* From the Herbert Irving Comprehensive
Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of
Physicians and Surgeons; and Departments of Biostatistics,
Epidemiology, and Health Policy and Management, Joseph L. Mailman
School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Boston
University Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Department of Statistics,
National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Purpose: Conventional medicine has had little to offer patients with
inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma; thus, many patients seek
alternative treatments. The National Cancer Institute, in 1998,
sponsored a randomized, phase III, controlled trial of proteolytic
enzyme therapy versus chemotherapy. Because most eligible patients
refused random assignment, the trial was changed in 2001 to a
controlled, observational study.
Methods: All patients were seen by one of the investigators at
Columbia University, and patients who received enzyme therapy were
seen by the participating alternative practitioner. All met strict
clinical criteria for eligibility. Of 55 patients who had inoperable
pancreatic cancer, 23 elected gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, and 32
elected enzyme treatment, which included pancreatic enzymes,
nutritional supplements, detoxification, and an organic diet. Primary
and secondary outcomes were overall survival and quality of life,
respectively.
Results: At enrollment, the treatment groups had no statistically
significant differences in patient characteristics, pathology, quality
of life, or clinically meaningful laboratory values. Kaplan-Meier
analysis found a 9.7-month difference in median survival between the
chemotherapy group (median survival, 14 months) and enzyme treatment
groups (median survival, 4.3 months) and found an adjusted-mortality
hazard ratio of the enzyme group compared with the chemotherapy group
of 6.96 (P < .001). At 1 year, 56% of chemotherapy-group patients were
alive, and 16% of enzyme-therapy patients were alive. The quality of
life ratings were better in the chemotherapy group than in the enzyme-
treated group (P < .01).
Conclusion: Among patients who have pancreatic cancer, those who chose
gemcitabine-based chemotherapy survived more than three times as long
(14.0 v 4.3 months) and had better quality of life than those who
chose proteolytic enzyme treatment.
You can read more here:
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2009/09/the_gonzalez_protocol_worse_than_useless.php
You seem to just love the empty threat of litigation.
Are you D*bee?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Tim Bolen
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- References:
- Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Tim Bolen
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Tim Bolen
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Martin
- Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- From: Tim Bolen
- Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- Prev by Date: Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- Next by Date: Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- Previous by thread: Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- Next by thread: Re: Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|