Re: More Lies From The Blogspot Spammer

On Apr 8, 10:41 am, The Good Rev Dr Heretic PhD
<Rev_Dr_Here...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:23:08 -0700, Mark Thorson <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave the blogspot SPAMMER wrote:

But as a pharma guy, you must see that there is a fairly large element
of GREED behind the big pharma disasters of the last few decades. Your

Once again, you revert to your false accusation that
I'm somehow involved with the pharmceutical industry.
You keep repeating this in order to create a false
sense of some sort of equivalency -- that it's
name-calling when I call you a spammer, so you're
justified in coming right back with as much nastiness
as you can muster.

But there is no such equivalency.  When I say you are
a spammer, that is completely accurate.  You only post
in newsgroups to get free advertising to drive traffic
to your commercial blogspot web site.  I have ZERO
commercial interests in posting to this newsgroup,
unlike you when you promote your business here.

If you would restrict yourself to alt and forsale
newsgroups, I would have no complaint about your spamming.
Spamming is permitted in those newsgroups.

When you accuse me of being employed by the pharmaceutical
industry, that is a LIE.  I've never received money or any
other sort of compensation or reward from the pharmaceutical
industry or any company or consultant or anything else
related to the pharmaceutical industry.

So, it is also not name-calling to say that you are a liar.
You are one of the nastiest liars to show up in this
newsgroup.  When I post important information about the
hazards of the products you promote -- information consumers
should know -- you go nuts, accusing me of working as a
"pharmaceutical chemist" or other lies.

You do that to draw attention away from legitimate criticism
of your warmed-over press releases.  You do that to create
doubt about what I say -- not by arguing against the facts
I present, but by attacking me personally.  Your tactic has
always been to attack the critic, not the criticism.
"Always attack, never defend."

Of course the kookers will call you a shill for the Pharm Industry.  It is just
standard kooktard operating procedure.

Of course the kowards will, as a matter of standard kowtard operating
procedure, have their messages removed after 6 days from google
archives. This is standard kowtard operating procedure.

Citizen Jimserac
Pharmaceutical industry shill or industry swill - was there a
difference?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More Lies From The Blogspot Spammer
    ... Standard kowtard remove post in 6 days procedure = SKRPI6DP ... of GREED behind the big pharma disasters of the last few decades. ... I'm somehow involved with the pharmceutical industry. ... newsgroups, I would have no complaint about your spamming. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Odd Ghostwriting Offer Raises Researchers Blood Pressure
    ... Sealey seems to be a bit of a critic of pharma influence in medicine: ... We previously discussed a controversy at the Society over ... panelists have to say about financial ties between the drug industry ... E. Sealey, a researcher and former president-elect of the American ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Avoiding Cancer-Linked Chemicals in Grilled Meats
    ... crap advice. ... (Street Savvy Science), ... of Science and a major pharmaceutical industry trade ... magazine Contract Pharma. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Calling all wlaking Chiropracters, Osteopaths, Physiotherapists and Doctor
    ... Even amongst the commercial pharma industry ... worked in the industry for virtually his entire career. ... be predominately mild. ... On the mild effects of Homeopathy, I'm unsure until I know more. ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • More Lies From The Blogspot Spammer
    ... Dave the blogspot SPAMMER wrote: ... But as a pharma guy, you must see that there is a fairly large element ... I'm somehow involved with the pharmceutical industry. ... newsgroups, I would have no complaint about your spamming. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
Loading