Re: No oncologist can match my results

On Jan 31, 6:26 pm, "Peter Moran" <pmo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<awthraw...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:615a9814-fb59-4fcc-ba0b-9e6499a642e5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 30, 9:15 pm, "Peter Moran" <pmo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



<awthraw...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:3a704ad7-2104-4ebe-965f-9bd7ed5881fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This week I received reports from 4 different people. One report was
for Stage 3b lung cancer. Two were for advanced breast cancers, and
the fourth for prostate cancer that had been the size of a baseball.
That one is down to a small plum.

The Stage 3b lung cancer now has no fluid in the lungs or heart sac,
and no more lymph involvement. Previously all three were involved and
the patient had gotten pneumonia. The wife who wrote me said the lung
tumor was "considerably smaller," but gave no dimensions.

His oncologist said he had NEVER seen such a dramatic improvement.

One previously untreated breast cancer had grown for 22 months from a
walnut to a grapefruit sized tumor with a knob on it. The woman says
that she and her husband can see it returning to normal, and the tumor
is getting softer and smaller.

Another woman is watching the lymph tumors in her neck tumors from
breast cancer get smaller and softer. She is also spitting out lysed
material from her lungs seven or eight times a day.

She also passed some white tissue during a bowel movement from exactly
where is not known.

The prostate case has seen the PSA drop from 5.8 to 3.8 and now down
to 3.1. His free PSA rose from 12% in July to 21% as of November.
(Normal range is 25% to 100%.) He didn't start the recipe until early
October.

The urologist started taking copious notes on the improvement and said
he would be watching the case very closely. He even went to my
information page to find out more about it.

Five days...four dramatic improvements. No oncologist has ever had a
week that good in his entire career.

Watch what Peter tries to do just below. He tries to separate each
case and say this one case would not be uncommon. Meanwhile, I pointed
out there were four cases in one week.

PM And I indicated why that would not be unusual in an oncological practice
(which was your claim)   = many of the effctes I described would be sen with
over fifiy per cent of that kind of case and an oncologist may be treating
dozens of such patients at a time..

If I tell you I have 4 one dollar bills and you say, "I've got a
dollar and a nickel." you don't have more money than me.

PM false analogy.  I am saying I have lots more of all kinds of  currency
than you and  would expect to be holding at least as many examples of common
denominations as you.  .   Your false premise seems to be that remissions
are rare in oncological practice,  which is not true.   It is true that
final cures   are rare with most kinds of inoperable cancer, but that is not
what you are claiming either..

Too many family members of cancer patients who have been subjected to
the knife, the poison, and the raygun, understand the differences
between the kinds of mistreatments you prefer compared to the way
these patients are responding.

The cases I've provided are noticing that they have more energy. One
man, 67, is able to surf...not the internet, but the Pacific Ocean.
I'm not saying my recipe will teach a person how to go surfing, but if
you already know how, there's no reason not to continue.

I fully expect that most people with advanced cancers will be able to
free themselves from their disease...if they haven't made the mistake
of getting prior chemo, radiation and surgery.

This is not to say that a chain smoker or the active alcoholic who
continues smoking or drinking is going to be saved, but it sure will
improve the lot of most.

But that is just "brag." We will have to wait for the actual results.
But it won't be presented so much to you for your approval. It will be
spread from cancer victor to cancer patients, like a daisy chain.


PM

 Why so? The short-term results described with breast cancer would be common

Answered above.


after initial treatment with radiotherapy, or with chemotherapy, or with
hormone antagonists for estrogen receptor positive examples.

Answered above.

Btw, PM, I don't know if it's a glitch with Google or what, but
finding your line-by lines responses are sometimes difficult. It might
work better if you hit the reply button, and entered your replies
where you'd like to make comments. If you want the part you're
replying to to be shown, just delete the space between "> [response]"
to ">[response]"

I don't want to miss what you have to say so I can be sure to provide
the appropriate insult ;-)


Maybe I should have mentioned that these patients are experiencing
INCREASED energy. And they didn't lose their hair or get sick while
their tumors are getting smaller and softer.

The woman with the grapefruit sized untreated tumor is noticing that
her breast is returning to normal. had she gone to the doctor, her
breast would have been cut off first. And then she'd have started on
chemo and or radiation.

Everyone knows what happens to a woman when those things happen. Their
skin goes pale and they age about ten years. My recipe does neither of
those things.

The prostate
cancer results would be common with radiotherapy or hormone antagonists or
chemotherapy.

Again the Moran recommended treatment would be surgery, which can
cause impotence, and the need to wear a diaper. Surgery also requires
anesthesia. An anesthesiologist has told me that it can take a year
for all the anesthesia to clear out of the body.

The prostate patient has told me he has experienced unnamed
IMPROVEMENTS in his overall health. Radiation can result in diapers
due to uncontrolled bladder or bowel movements.

With resolution of the pneumonia, presumably with
antibiotics, the lung cancer findings may not be so unusual.

Notice how Moran glided over the ATTENDING oncologist's statement that
he had NEVER seen such a dramatic improvement in his career. He also
glided over the removal of all the lymph involvement. In Stage 3b,
there is severe lymph involvement.

And the pleural effusion (lung fluid) and heart mediastinum both of
which cleared up. So it wasn't just pneumonia, it was 4 things, (1)
lungs (2) heart sac (3) severe lymph, (4) tumor shrunk considerably.

So in this case Moran has 25 cents in his pocket and is trying to pass
it off as a dollar.

As I've demonstrated, 4 of a kind beats one of a kind. And the
individual cases compare quite favorably to the comparisons tried but
failed to make.

As a bonus, last week I learned of a patient who had a biopsied early
stomach cancer. He was scheduled for surgery. After a week on my
recipe, his cancer cleared up. No cancer.



I wager that the woman with the breast cancer that was left untreated when
it was the size of a walnut is in for a very rough time and will live to
regret not having proper treatment.

She might have been regretting before, it but not now. But she was
smart enough to know that "proper treatment" does not include the trio
of death Moran prefers. This woman buried her mother after she
suffered through cancer mistreatments and died.

Do keep us posted with her further
progress. The same with the others -- it is weird how many testimonials
end at the beginning of the story -- we are entitled to know how things
ended up . Too often testimonials reflect unreliable observations as to
what persons believed, or wanted to believe at one point in their illness,
usually, as with these, very shortly after starting a new treatments and
desperately wanting to believe that it is working.

PM

When urologist says the tumor has shrunk from a baseball to a plum, it
is not the patient who is desperately wanting to believe. When the
free PSA increases from 12 to 21%, and the PSA goes from 5.8 to 3.8
and 3.1, that is not desperately wanting to believe.

When the oncologist says the improvement is the most dramatic he has
ever seen, that is not a patient desperately wanting to believe.

.

Loading