Re: This coulda been a great forum
- From: Peter Bowditch <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 08:16:11 GMT
"Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> >>"Peter Moran"
<pmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c7tfl4tkusscgvk54lqg37jeo5cpr798vj@xxxxxxxxxx
"Peter Moran" <pmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is a challenge on my web
site for anyone who believes they can cure established cancer
www.cancerwatcher.com
I have had a similar challenge going since May, 2000. In the 3161 days
since, there have been exactly zero cancer "curers" prepared to come
forward.
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/cancer100.htm
I think your challenge is very rational, but too difficult, Peter.
Patient
documentation and follow-up in alternative cancer clinics is poor and
cases
where cancer is treated ONLY by alternatives are still relatively rare.
Finding 100 well-documented cases of five year survival would be very
difficult for anyone even if alternative methods worked in as many as 5%
of
cases with active cancer, and it clearly doesn't do that or we would be
seeing cases everywhere.
It would be enough for a start if they could merely produce cases where
proven cancer was shown going away with their treatment. A handful
of
such cases with normally poor-prognsois cancers out of recent experience
would be very, very strong evidence of a useful treatment. I don't
expect
absolute proof --that would come with further testing.
Peter Moran
I chose the number 100 deliberately.
No, your very own words:
I live near a large hospital which treats a lot of people with cancer. With
a bit of effort and the right pieces of paper, I could get case histories of
100 patients which showed that:
Hulda Clark's
Stan Burzynski
not-Dr "Cee"
Jan
Are not the subjects.
Why not, Jan? We were talking about people who claim to be able to
cure cancer. I agree with you that Hulda Clark and Stan Burzynski are
definitely not anything to talk about if real cures for cancer are
being discussed. And I only mentioned not-Dr "Cee" because he said
that Gerson had "cured" 600 people. I agree with you that, again, when
talking about people who can cure cancer, Gerson is a joke and doesn't
fit the category.
Peter Bowditch
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This coulda been a great forum
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: This coulda been a great forum
- References:
- Re: This coulda been a great forum
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: This coulda been a great forum
- Prev by Date: Re: The Popularity of Altie Treatments
- Next by Date: Re: This coulda been a great forum
- Previous by thread: Re: This coulda been a great forum
- Next by thread: Re: This coulda been a great forum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|