Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Peter Bowditch <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:36:08 +1000
"Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hulda Clark
Is not the subject.
Point 1 - Tim Bolen attacked me in the thread, therefore making the
subject anything I want to talk about.
Point 2 - The subject line contains the words "lacks Scientific
Integrity" and thus allows discussion of Hulda Clark as an example of
the genre.
Point 3 - Take a rusty star picket, sit on it, twist.
--
Peter Bowditch
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: D. C. Sessions
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- References:
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: jurimed2
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: D. C. Sessions
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: jurimed2
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- Prev by Date: Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- Next by Date: Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- Previous by thread: Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- Next by thread: Re: CDC Lacks Scientific Integrity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|