Re: Boys family forced into chemo.



On May 14, 6:20 pm, "Peter Moran" <pmo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Caesar J. B. Squitti" <squit...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:8f08902a-084a-4ae1-9fa5-010eea3c3025@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boys family forced into chemo.

PM Because it offers the best chance of cure? This crops up regularly,
but only because childhood cancers are among the few cancers where
chemotherapy has quite a respectable cure rate, even after metastases have
occurred.

The rest of this material is superficial and misleading. It fails to
recognise that the vast majority of chemotherapy is used for cancers that
are well recognised to be rarely ever cured by chemotherapy alone. That is
not news to any informed person. But there can be other benefits, either
as palliation, prolonging life, or as an adjunct to other treatments.

There are certainly some cancers which are very unlikely to respond
significantly to chemotherapy and there will be argument as to whether such
patients should be offered what small chances there are. Response rates
are not wholly predictable.

PM

Historians of the future will look upon
chemotherapy in our era exactly as we
look askance at the bloodletting
and other primitive practices of
past eras.

OH, "chemotherapy" (polite name for poison) does
indeed kill cancer cells - problem is, it kills
other cells, including IMMUNE system cells.

In the closed minded little world of "scientific"
standard medicine, this is deemed a triumph
for modern medicine, and patients really
do survive (the lucky ones whose immune systems
recover fast enough).

But there is a word, a word SO frightening
to standard medicine that it has become
demonized, hysterically denounced, heaped
innuendo upon, lobbyists sent forth to
attack it, a word so terrifying to the
"scientists" (sic) that it is found necessary
to misrepresent research, lie, ridicule
with woo-woo, denounce as mere placebo
and/or discredit either the perfectly
well credentialed researchers (many of them
MD's and PhD') or their scientific journals...

What is this word so terrifying as to have caused
all this ruckus, this stampede of innuendo,
this hysterical dennunciation when supposed
scientists start acting in very unscientific
ways, start whining and jumping up and down
with temper tantrums like little
3 year old children...

The word is...

ALTERNATIVES.

Citizen Jimserac

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: For those of you with Medline access........
    ... > informed consent whenever chemotherapy is offered to patients. ... Pour ou contre la chimiothérapie? ... tumeurs estimées par les auteurs comme représentatives. ... cytotoxique n'apporte qu'une contribution mineure à la survie des cancers" ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)
  • Re: Food-based Laetrile -- Nutrient that Reduces Cancer Risk
    ... chemotherapy franchise that I defend on behalf of my sponsors, ... of possible cyanide poisoning. ... cancers, despite your promotion of them on behalf of your sponsors. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Breast Cancer Research
    ... seems that current recommendations for chemotherapy were made before anyone ... bothered to look at estrogen dependent tumors and non-estrogen dependent ... estrogen and the 30 percent whose cancers were not. ...
    (talk.politics.medicine)
  • Re: Boys family forced into chemo.
    ... PM Because it offers the best chance of cure? ... This crops up regularly, but only because childhood cancers are among the few cancers where chemotherapy has quite a respectable cure rate, even after metastases have occurred. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: BBC4 Visions of the future - Supermice!!!
    ... A human being is a collection of different systems and organs, muscles, ... specific cancers so there's no single cure - or genetic fix for ageing. ... synchronised over time by the evolutionary process. ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)