Re: Virtually Zero Alternative Cancer Research Occurirng


"Citizen Jimserac" <Jimserac@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d06a7a98-5caa-40d6-aaab-a33860321e4b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 3, 9:08 pm, "Hawki" <Hawk...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
we didn't need you to repeat..no copy..what the original poster said

my point...surgery is still the primary treatment at these Cancer
Centers...

if you could read...you would realize that

"Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:Gn6Tj.14666$2g1.12239@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



"Hawki" <Hawk...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:T91Tj.2254$506.10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"CitizenJimserac" <Jimse...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:488fc483-f605-446c-9121-649f64079ed0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 2, 3:31 am, "Peter Moran" <pmo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In America there are "cancer" centers
appearing in many major cities, emphasizing
"integrative" care methods they
appear to be quite popular.

perhaps you need to re read their site

first listed was "surgery"...as state of the art in cancer
treatment...also said surgery alone in many cases is all that is
needed

surely the "rest" of what they offer..accupuncture..etc...is to make
the
patient feel good...after the surgery etc has removed the cancer



I agree with your comment about what is the primary treatment at these
centers.

I DISAGREE with your comment that things such as Acupuncture and
Homeopathy are there to make the patient feel good after the surgery
has removed the cancer.

The essence of the INTEGRATIVE approach is the utilization of ALL
beneficial therapies, coordinated, in the treatment and restoration of
health regarding the WHOLE patient rather than the diminution of the
patient into some broken machine in which the removal of a diseased
part is considered sufficient treatment, a view held by "standard"
medicine.

I disagree with the implication that surgery is sufficient to remove
the cancer. Frequent checks for recurrence most be made in those
patients that have had surgery, and in even the best result cases,
the cancer can and does return later. Surgery is a stopgap which
treats the principle symptoms NOT the root cause.

Neither is chemotherapy, a euphemism for POISONING
a sufficient treatment though its use is widespread and its results
fair. The destruction of the patient's immune system to get rid of
one disease leaves them open to death from even the common cold - NOT
a wise idea.

Interestingly, of people who have had chemotherapy and survived the
cancer, many will REFUSE IT A SECOND TIME and chose death rather than
repeat the experience, a telling indictment of it.

The future will view chemotherapy as something as primitive to our
century as bloodletting was to earlier centuries.

Citizen Jimserac

Yes I would agree that the current treatments are for the most a failure
especially in chemo therapy and radiology treatments.
From what I can understand these treatments are used as a primary treatment
which have a short term impact on some cancers but fail to control the
disease in most cases. Even the Doctors dispensing these treatments admit
this consequence.
What really needs to be disclosed to all patients is the reality of the
disease progression despite surgery, chemo and radiation. That's the hard
part for any Oncologist to admit the truth to someone who wants desperately
to live.
Are there answers to this dilemma, well I think there are but certainly not
in the continuation of immune suppressant chemo which if it cannot harness
the cancers growth may in fact spur the spreading of the cancer. Taking away
the bodies natural defences may well account for the spread of the cancer
which is a well known fact for cancer patients and their treatments.
Sincerely, Rod.


.

Loading