Re: Breast Cancer - Alternative therapy-Mexico update

On Apr 6, 5:22 pm, Bee <Butterflies2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 6, 12:24 pm, Martin <idnontwan...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:



So, there we have it. The statements were either not mine, or backed
up by plenty scientific evidence or they didn't need any evidence.

You know Marty, I think most of us that post here could really give
two
shits if you agree or disagree-. Instead of insulting the
information, and
asking questions that I could bring to her next I'm out in that area,
there
is always this strange cult like thinking between individuals here
that enjoy
engaging in bullying. You really need to read the charter; no one has
to prove
jack *** about anything--it is a consumer newsgroup----you asked me
to get
more information; I did. Then you claim it doesn't work---how would
you even know?
You wouldn't.

He has actually done some pretty good skeptical postings
but in this thread resorts to hysteria and insults, even after
clearly being proven logically wrong regarding the efficacy
of "surgery" for cancer followed by the necessity of
"chemotherapy" (sic) to ensure that no "tiny" bits of cancer
are left - a clear and present indication of the inadequacy
of the surgery in the first place.

Surgery and chemotherapy for cancer are what bloodletting
was to previous centuries. History will be as unkind
to those of the present that espouse these "treatments"
as they were to those of the past.

The time has come to accept the search for better
ways. HINT: I would not expect too much from the "cancer research"
industry, they seem to be looking for solutions in about the same
manner as Bush is pursuing the hunt for Bin Laden.

Citizen Jimserac
.

Quantcast