Re: The Anti Alts who have been here for years.

On Mar 27, 8:57 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 27, 7:33 pm, PeterB <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Mar 26, 7:29 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 25, 11:01 pm, PeterB <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 25, 9:00 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 25, 6:52 pm, PeterB <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 25, 2:42 pm, Martin <idontwan...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

That's not what you said some time ago. You said something like 'we
are going to take action', 'we' being the supplement industry. When
confronted with that, you responded along the lines of 'so what I get
paid to be here, the people on the other side are too and it does not
invalidate my points'.

That's quite an example of revisionist history.  

Hio, Petey!

OiH, Markey!

I have never been

paid to comment on Usenet.  

Prove it!

You first!

Now, Petey, do remember that you made a claim, and YOU must prove it.

We both already proved our motives, Markey.  I know it's not that you
don't remember, rather that you're in no position to admit it.

Thanksd for proving that you are a paid shill.

Thanks for proving what motivates you every day of your life: Money.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: WARNING: Industry is Blogging These NewsGroups to Maintain Their Monopolies
    ... >> But I am a Pharma Blogger, just like you are an Alt-Blogger. ... >> owned and paid for by the supplement industry. ... you'd be a waste of money. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: LVT: more arguments against
    ... In sci.econ, Mark Monson wrote: ... > If this argument was valid then simply proving you paid for stolen ... Words are flying out like endless rain into a paper cup. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Death of OTA Broadcasting
    ... starting SS in a couple of years, but that's not taxpayer money. ... Thus proving another thing you know nothing about. ... paid me back. ... someone working - that's the definition of living off the tax payer. ...
    (alt.tv.tech.hdtv)
  • Re: LVT: more arguments against
    ... >> If this argument was valid then simply proving you paid for stolen ... our laws give a buyer better title than his seller ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Shumi caught testing again on slicks!
    ... paid off. ... So where did it mention FW operatives in the article, ... proving yourself to be an idiot again. ...
    (rec.autos.sport.f1)