Re: Cancer truth
- From: "gorkaginny58@xxxxxxx" <gorkaginny58@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 12, 7:06 pm, Chris <ad...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi there,
I was listening to a recording recently about the increasing cancer problem in
the western world and the nature of cancer in general. There were some
interesting points brought forward, the major point being that cancer is in
fact a metabolic disease and it may be prevented with the controversially
dubbed Vitamin B17. Is this familiar to anyone?
He claimed that this Vitamin B17 was similar found in very few food groups
that are common in our diets today and that during the industrial revolution,
wheat was phased in to replace millet, which contained the Vitamin, and thus
cancer rates began to increase rapidly.
Another interesting point he made was that in other cultures where people had
diets rich in Vitamin B17, the cancer rates were zero, and that apricot
kernels contained an abundance of the Vitamin.
It's interesting to note that the medical establishment rejected the
experimental evidence of this phenomenal breakthrough, as so often has
happened in the past with other breakthroughs.
What do you think about this?
----------------http://www.ultimate-well-being.com
My son was dignoised with terminal brain cancer in 1991, at the age of
13, given 3 months to live. I took him out of the country for natural
treatment, including B17, no chemo or radiation. I have been helping
people from all over the world since then. Below is information on B17
that I put together. I do not charge for my help and I do not receive
ANY type of compensation for any of this. If you have questions please
feel free to email me privately or by cell 269.876.8475.
Jenny
A doctor from the United States FDA once said that Laetrile contains
'free' hydrogen cyanide [HCN] and, thus, is toxic. I would like to
correct that misconception. There is no 'free' hydrogen cyanide [HCN]
in Laetrile. When Laetrile comes in contact with the enzyme beta-
glycosidase [the cancer cell], the Laetrile is broken down into four
molecules:
(a) Two molecules of glucose
(b) One molecule of benzaldehyde
(c) One molecule of hydrogen cyanide [HCN]
Within the body, the cancer cell and only the cancer cell contains
that enzyme, beta-glycosidase, therefore, if no cancer is in the body,
no hydrogen cyanide can be released.
The key word here is that the HCN must be FORMED. It is not found
floating around freely in the Laetrile and then released. It must be
manufactured. The enzyme beta-glycosidase, and only that enzyme, is
capable of manufacturing the HCN from Laetrile. If there is no beta-
glycosidase, no HCN can be formed from the Laetrile.
"Laetrile does contain the cyanide radical [CN]. This same cyanide
radical is contained in Vitamin B-12 and in berries such as
blackberries, blueberries and strawberries. You never hear of anyone
getting cyanide poisoning from B-12 or any of the above-mentioned
berries, because they do not. The cyanide radical [CN] and hydrogen
cyanide [HCN] are two completely different compounds, just as pure
sodium [Na+]--one of the most toxic substances known to mankind--and
sodium chloride [NaCl], table salt, are two completely different
compounds."
When the medical community first explored the possibility of using
Laetrile as a cancer drug in the 1920s, they discovered that
amygdaline secreted cyanide. They just didn't understand what
triggered it, and they were clueless why it was important. Cyanide
was, after all, a poison that killed people. That was enough.
Hydrogen cyanide [HCN] is a chemical that kills cancer cells and
leaves healthy cells intact. While the NCI found HCN in the patients
in the NCCTG study, the FDA, a couple of years later found no evidence
that Laetrile contained cyanide. Of course, the FDA tested the
Laetrile extract. Cyanide, Dr. Binzel discovered, does not appear
until Laetrile comes into contact with a cancer cell. At that point,
cyanide is present.
The reason the FDA flip-flops so much on whether or not Laetrile is a
toxic element is that when they alleged that Laetrile was toxic in the
first Jason Vale hearing, Vale's lawyers challenged their claim and
asked them to present evidence to that fact. The FDA admitted they had
none. Nevertheless, they still insist that a minimum lethal dose of
HCN is 100 mg per 150 lbs. In 1984 the FDA determined that an apricot
seed contains 2.92 mg/g of HCN and a peach pit contains 2.50 mg/g.
This is interesting since a later FDA test revealed that Laetrile, the
serum form of amygdaline contains no HCN at all, and thus, is
worthless as an anticancer agent.
It is clear that the Laetrile debate will continue for the foreseeable
future. In the meantime, the pharmaceutical industry continues to test
anticancer medicines derived from artificial amygdaline, claiming that
it is much safer, and much more stable, than organic amygdaline. It's
a safe bet, however, that before the pharmaceutical industry
introduces an effective cancer-fighting amygdaline drug which will
cost the consumer much, much more than a bag of apricot seeds, serum
and tablet forms of Vitamin B-17 will be regulated by the FDA and
Laetrile will be classified as a prescription drug.
The FDA banned vitamin B17 years ago
although it is banned, it is not illegal
You Ask: What's the Difference
What it means is that ~ If any hospital uses laetrile the law says
that they jeopardize any grants from the government as well as any
monies from Medicaid and other hospital insurance originating from the
government. Since nearly all of hospital revenues come from patient
insurance, not one hospital in the U.S. will take the chance and use
any banned substance including, Amygdaline (also called vitamin B17
and Laetrile.)
Any Doctor, in the United States, that wants to use the substance from
apricot pits, must have their patient fill out a form and then the
doctor must submit the form to the FDA... Again, doctors don't want to
get involved in this and would rather keep their names off of the FDA
lists. Additionally, the doctor's malpractice insurance will not be
valid if they prescribe laetrile (B17, amygdalin) to a patient. The
American Medical Association (AMA) treats any Doctor that prescribes
laetrile to be a renegade (traitorous) and that he has violated the
AMA's membership policies and will be subject to membership
termination. Therefore any Doctor that prescribes laetrile may destroy
his career as a Doctor.
Any individual that sells laetrile must not claim that it does
anything in his place of business. Many health food stores in the past
were raided and had to give up their supplies of B17 because the B17
was near books that claimed that the B17 was the answer to cancer...In
other words the books were near the B17 in the stores and was
therefore considered "labeling" which is a term used by the FDA.
Labeling according to the FDA is against the law and can be
prosecuted.
However on the Internet, it is different. Internet law is tricky and
not the same as U.S. commercial law. In one case, Ken Kholas took the
FDA to court and won his B17 back. That court case proved it wasn't
wrong for him to have or to sell it thought it cost Ken's father a
tremendous amount of money.
What THIS MEANS TO YOU is that you can purchase, use and have B17 and
you will not have violated any law.
THIS INFORMATION IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cancer truth
- From: drceephd
- Re: Cancer truth
- From: Richard Schultz
- Re: Cancer truth
- References:
- Cancer truth
- From: Chris
- Cancer truth
- Prev by Date: Re: Cancer truth
- Next by Date: Re: Adjuvant chemotherapy fails
- Previous by thread: Re: Cancer truth
- Next by thread: Re: Cancer truth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
