Re: Big Pharma, Studies, etc.


"Mark Probert" <mark.probert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6bfd22f1-9403-4ea3-b76b-02600791c190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 28, 5:41 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Feb 28, 3:54 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Feb 28, 3:32 pm, drcee...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Feb 28, 11:27 am, "D. C. Sessions" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Suppression, publication bias, sock-puppet websites, and
all the other red meat for the MHA faithful:

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=60

I'm not expecting much comment on this, though, thanks to
the "path of least resistance" principle.

--
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
| The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ----------+

I might be more inclined to participate if the site were titled
"psuedo-sciencebasedmedicine.con"

Schmuckie,

Good one! I wish I had thought of that.

did you bother to read the article "A Foolish

Consistency"?

Of course you didn't, since it proves you are an idiot.

You see, a RealDoctor, not a fake one like you, is discussing the
relationship between medical practice and the pharmaceutical
industry.

I've always thought that female pharmaceutical sales reps were
suspiciously hot!




I have to agree that looks are part of the qualifications

tho......the male reps are also usually gorgeous...I have a nephew...6'8 who
is a rep...his wardrobe is Hollywoodish..etc



A neighbor's wife is a rep. You are right.

A friend, who is a neurologist, married one. She is incadescent.


.

Quantcast