Re: Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- From: Mark Probert <mark.probert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:54:58 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 28, 3:32 pm, drcee...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 28, 11:27 am, "D. C. Sessions" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suppression, publication bias, sock-puppet websites, and
all the other red meat for the MHA faithful:
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=60
I'm not expecting much comment on this, though, thanks to
the "path of least resistance" principle.
--
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
| The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ----------+
I might be more inclined to participate if the site were titled
"psuedo-sciencebasedmedicine.con"
Schmuckie, did you bother to read the article "A Foolish
Consistency"?
Of course you didn't, since it proves you are an idiot.
You see, a RealDoctor, not a fake one like you, is discussing the
relationship between medical practice and the pharmaceutical
industry.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- From: The One True Zhen Jue
- Re: Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- References:
- Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- From: D. C. Sessions
- Re: Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- From: drceephd
- Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: can coffee grounds help ?
- Next by Date: Re: MD Accused Of Speeding Death To Get Organs
- Previous by thread: Re: Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- Next by thread: Re: Big Pharma, Studies, etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|