Re: My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:19:10 -0700
In message <47962028$0$17189$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Carole wrote:
"D. C. Sessions" <dcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d11h65-8vs.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In message <fn3ga4$893$7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Schultz wrote:
I'm still waiting for her to figure out that her treatment directly
contradicts the principles of the theory on which it is claimed to
be based.
Wouldn't that require at least some sort of consistency check?
Is that the same as the increasingly re-iterative checks, where the
complexity of the wordspeak disappears up a duck's arse.
That's a rather eloquent, if indirect, confirmation.
--
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable |
| e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. |
| There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --------------+
.
- References:
- My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- From: Carole
- Re: My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- From: Peter Moran
- Re: My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- From: Richard Schultz
- Re: My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- From: D. C. Sessions
- Re: My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- From: Carole
- My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- Prev by Date: Re: Mark Probert - Do you have PERSONAL reason why you don't want ?this group discussing the AAPS v. Texas Medical Board case?
- Next by Date: Re: "Cancer is a fungus" --or fraud?
- Previous by thread: Re: My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- Next by thread: Re: My article on athletes foot has been published -- check it out
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
