Re: Tim Bolen again

<jurimed2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:d11b05cb-9e5e-4d45-a612-f3e0555b1d9d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 31, 1:41 pm, "Peter Moran" <pmo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<jurim...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:a23829b0-558d-4c6c-b60c-034c75ee1159@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx







> Peter Moran:

> You are still trying to obfuscate the issue - and you are not doing
> well. Frankly, you are beginning to whine.

> You stated that Hulda Clark is "one of the worst cancer charlatans in
> history. " I have offered you the opportunity to scientifically
> critique Clark's "The Cure for All Advanced Cancers," line-by-line,
> chapter-by-chapter, and you INSTANTLY change the subject. Now you
> state "Everyone knows what the scientific community thinks of Hulda
> Clark. Even a lot of "alternative" practitioners and supporters such
> as Andrew Weil and Ralph Moss and even, I think, Mercola think she is
> untrustworthy."

> Well, now there's another pile of quackbuster bull***. Show me what
> the "scientific community" thinks about Clark. The scientific
> community communicates its thinking by way of their scientific
> journals. So drop a scientific paper, backing your statement, into
> this discussion. You can't do that, simply, because you made that
> up..

(Heh, heh, heh) You really are amazing. Your whole method is to keep
making outrageous assertions without a scrap of evidential support but now I
am required to produce a journal reference for everything I say?

Meanwhile, Hulda is STILL a charlatan. She is a charlatan because she
claims to be able to easily cure any cancer and no one can produce cured
cancer patients.

My offer to discuss with you whatever you consider Hulda's most
significant medical or scientific discovery (from any book you like) still
stands. . Be precise as to what the claim is and how she shows that it
is so.

PM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Peter Moran:

No Peter, YOU are the charlatan here. You are using endless changes
in the issue to cover-up the fact that YOU cannot produce any
scientific issues with what Clark says about cancer.

You really don't seem to get the idea that the world of health care is
passing you by - has passed you by. YOU, and yours, are not the
judges of what health care systems and paradigms work - for what you,
and yours, offer is "failure." As a society we do not allow those who
fail to sit in judgment, for long, on those that are supercede them.

Live with it, knowing that as you go into your end years, your dreams
will remind you that YOU, and yours, lost the war on cancer, because,
it has become obvious, you couldn't change out of your comfort zone
and do the right thing. So, you made up obfuscations, and set up to
criticize your betters, like Clark and Gerson.

I can't help but see justice in the fact that both "top quackbusters"
Victor Herbert, and Saul Green died of the very thing they protected -
the cancer system. Frankly, I hope they experienced the best the
chemo-pushers had to offer.

Disappointed in you in California...

Tim Bolen


PM So you still can't produce anything but attacks on those who speak the truth? I am happy to let others judge.

PM

PM

.