Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: "Carole" <hubbca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:14:27 +1100
<drceephd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a9680d45-56a8-4933-b98d-a6467b5aa2aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 2, 5:46 pm, "Carole" <hub...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How did the black death of Europe in the middle ages spread and kill
millions ... wasn't it by fleas which lived on rats?
Sorry Carole, I cannot resist giving an answer to this.
Consider that rats and their fleas have always been with us. Why then
would the plague arise, run its course, and disappear when the the
rats and their fleas were still doing their thing?
I see your point.
But on the other hand, the plague did begin somewhere and work its way
across Europe which seems to indicate it was contagious.
Why was Nostradamus successful during the plague years by simply
instituting sanitation? He never hunted the rats.
I submit that the rats and their fleas were present before the plague,
during the plague, and after the palgue. We still have the rats
today, but we do not have the plague. Why? The answer is not flea
powder. :)
To find the answer you have to look at the diet and lifestyle of the
times.
Human nutrition was an unknown quantity. The usual fare for the
peasants was "peas porridge hot, peas porridge cold, peas porridge in
the pot nine days old." These were very malnurished humans.
Sanitation. The citys were walled. The people lived in crowed
conditions. They slept many to a bed. They had no running water, no
sewer systems, and no garbage collection. The parlament of England
had to dismiss meetings because the Thames was a sewer and stuck so
bad at times the aristocats could not convene at parliment. The
people bathed maybe once a year. You knew when you were near a city
because you could smell the stink of it.
It was out of these kinds of conditions that the plague arose. This
was after the Roman baths were destroyed, and bathing became a sin.
Not only did the plague enter Europe, so did smallpox. Both
conditions are caused by inattention to human nutrition and
sanitation, both internal and external.
If anyone thinks that the fleas on rats caused the plague, or bed bugs
caused smallpox, explain to me why both still exist today, but the
plague and smallpox are not the vigilant hunters of unwary sheeple
that they can prove scientifically. Show me the tests. Show me the
data. I could care less how many have been poisoned and killed by
vaccines.
Additionally, a few years ago India had a bout of the plague after a
severe flood. Where has the plague been these 100s of years. Why and
how did the plague resurface in India only to dissapear once again?
Ok, I am thinking that the plague probably remained latent all that time
until the conditions were right for its reappearance.
But notice how once it occurs in one person, it spreads to others and
becomes a plague.
You would think that if disease only arise from within a body, that
everybody would be coming down with different diseases instead of the same
one.
Seems once there is a breakout, people need to be quarantined to stop the
spread. How do you explain this if its not contagious?
Carole
www.cellsalts.net
DrCee
Not a pharma shill
Not a member of the medical monopoly
Not a member of the church of modern medicine
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: drceephd
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- References:
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: Carole
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: whrlwnd2
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: Carole
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: drceephd
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: Carole
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- From: drceephd
- Re: Do germs cause disease?
- Prev by Date: Re: Do germs cause disease?
- Next by Date: Re: Do germs cause disease?
- Previous by thread: Re: Do germs cause disease?
- Next by thread: Re: Do germs cause disease?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading