Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Rudy Canoza <pipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:43:01 -0800
drceephd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 28, 8:13 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:There is no monopoly. You clearly don't know what the
term means.
Rockefeller said it best. Competition is a sin.
Another fake quote, like the Sabin one.
I think their ill gotten gains are over $2,000,000,000,000 a year in theThey are not ill-gotten.
USA alone.
Oh , then I should have said their healthy gotten gains? I agree that
is mainly healthy humans paying out the as_ for disease insurance in
an effort to avoid being bankrupted by the greedy docs if and when
they become diseased enough to make a claim on their disease
insurance.
Those words were English words, but it wasn't English.
You are not supplied with only one choice for medical
treatment.
Please show us that hospitals have wings for osteopathic treatment,
chiropractic treatment, naturopathic treatment, etc.
Why should they have wings for those? They don't work.
Strange to say, whenever I go to any tire store, all they ever offer is tires. What's up with that?
You only are given one choice, ya dufus.
No, that's false.
Offer the people only one choice (how manyThere is no monopoly. There are competing treatments
choices are you given in a hospital ?), then only pay for one choice
( the disease insurance industry ), and you have modern evidence-based
monopolistic medicine.
within modern evidence-based medicine, and there are
competing suppliers of the same kinds of treatments.
Dang, how stupid can anyone be? The thorasic surgeons hate the
cardiologists. Each is a competitor.
There you go.
There are competing suppliers fo the same kinds of treatments?? How
many Ford dealers competing for auto sales does it take to make a
monopoly?
Clearly, you don't understand what monopoly means.
The allopaths have no idea of the true causes ofMostly, they /do/ know the true causes. Some they
disease. They are simply legalized drug pushers
don't, but they know that certain treatments get rid of
the illness completely.
The docs only palliate.
False.
They only suppress symptoms.
Repetitious and false.
They never, ever, get rid of an illness completely.
Patently false.
A patient healed is a
customer lost.
In fact, it is the quacks, especially the chiropractors, who seem to have their customers stuck in a revolving door.
No, the propaganda, and most of the vituperation, comeNo, the only attack on rationality in this, uh,Check the comments made on this site and you will see that it is the
"debate" comes from the altie side.
pharma shills engaging in irrational attacks, name calling, diversion,
etc. All the tools of the propagandists.
from the quack medicine purveyors - the alties.
I disagree.
Because you're a partisan shill.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: t
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: David Wright
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- References:
- A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Laurie
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Rudy Canoza
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: drceephd
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Rudy Canoza
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: drceephd
- A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Prev by Date: Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Next by Date: Innovation Urged for TCM
- Previous by thread: Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Next by thread: Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|