Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: drceephd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:35:11 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 28, 8:13 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is no monopoly. You clearly don't know what the
term means.
Rockefeller said it best. Competition is a sin.
I think their ill gotten gains are over $2,000,000,000,000 a year in the
USA alone.
They are not ill-gotten.
Oh , then I should have said their healthy gotten gains? I agree that
is mainly healthy humans paying out the as_ for disease insurance in
an effort to avoid being bankrupted by the greedy docs if and when
they become diseased enough to make a claim on their disease
insurance.
You are not supplied with only one choice for medical
treatment.
Please show us that hospitals have wings for osteopathic treatment,
chiropractic treatment, naturopathic treatment, etc.
You only are given one choice, ya dufus.
Offer the people only one choice (how many
choices are you given in a hospital ?), then only pay for one choice
( the disease insurance industry ), and you have modern evidence-based
monopolistic medicine.
There is no monopoly. There are competing treatments
within modern evidence-based medicine, and there are
competing suppliers of the same kinds of treatments.
Dang, how stupid can anyone be? The thorasic surgeons hate the
cardiologists. Each is a competitor.
There are competing suppliers fo the same kinds of treatments?? How
many Ford dealers competing for auto sales does it take to make a
monopoly?
The allopaths have no idea of the true causes of
disease. They are simply legalized drug pushers
Mostly, they /do/ know the true causes. Some they
don't, but they know that certain treatments get rid of
the illness completely.
The docs only palliate. They only suppress symptoms. They never,
ever, get rid of an illness completely. A patient healed is a
customer lost. Get a clue.
No, the only attack on rationality in this, uh,
"debate" comes from the altie side.
Check the comments made on this site and you will see that it is the
pharma shills engaging in irrational attacks, name calling, diversion,
etc. All the tools of the propagandists.
No, the propaganda, and most of the vituperation, come
from the quack medicine purveyors - the alties.
I disagree.
DrCee
Not a pharma shill
Not a member of the medical monopoly
Not a member of the church of modern medicine
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Rudy Canoza
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: David Wright
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- References:
- A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Laurie
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Rudy Canoza
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: drceephd
- Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- From: Rudy Canoza
- A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Prev by Date: BALONEY: Acme Juicer One of the Best Find a Sale on Acme Juicers
- Next by Date: Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Previous by thread: Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Next by thread: Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|