Re: A brief history of modern western medical "systems".

drceephd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 28, 4:08 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No. Modern evidence-based medicine works. It is not a
failure.

Well, it certainly does produce a lot of income for the monopoly.

There is no monopoly. You clearly don't know what the term means.



I think their ill gotten gains are over $2,000,000,000,000 a year in the
USA alone.

They are not ill-gotten.


False. Modern evidence-based medicine works. If it
didn't, people wouldn't use it.

If you are supplied with only one choice for an auto, then people
would choose it.

You are not supplied with only one choice for medical treatment.


We would all be driving the same type of auto. The
same is true in medicine.

No, it isn't.


Offer the people only one choice (how many
choices are you given in a hospital ?), then only pay for one choice
( the disease insurance industry ), and you have modern evidence-based
monopolistic medicine.

There is no monopoly. There are competing treatments within modern evidence-based medicine, and there are competing suppliers of the same kinds of treatments.



However, because the cause(s) of the "disease" are ignored, not
identified,
Utter bull***.

Nope, truth.

Nope - utter bull***.


The allopaths have no idea of the true causes of
disease. They are simply legalized drug pushers

Mostly, they /do/ know the true causes. Some they don't, but they know that certain treatments get rid of the illness completely.



No, the only attack on rationality in this, uh,
"debate" comes from the altie side.

Check the comments made on this site and you will see that it is the
pharma shills engaging in irrational attacks, name calling, diversion,
etc. All the tools of the propagandists.

No, the propaganda, and most of the vituperation, come from the quack medicine purveyors - the alties.
.

Quantcast