Re: Pharma Boy, our cross-poster, Strikes Again

On Oct 31, 12:06 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave wrote:

On Oct 30, 7:26 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You are not competent to interpret the scientific
literature for a broader audience. You have
insufficient scientific training and poor
writing ability, even if you had a sincere desire
to present quality articles that are free of
commercial bias.

Pharma Boy, let's compare resumes. You know you won't put it out
there, possibly because you post with a pseudonym, but most likely
because you are a phoney. Many people here have called you on your
posts.

Again, like a petulant child you are engaging in
name-calling and inventing false accusations. I have
always posted under my own name.

Great, glad to hear it. Now we know who Pharma Boy is. Anyone who
cares to can go back over the history of this forum and the ones that
you always cross post to (Pharma Boy, that's another "troll" habit you
ought to eliminate). They'll find you've been called a "pharma
industry shill", a "paid mouthpiece," and every version of the word
"troll" by many, many posters of these forums. You seem to love to
make enemies.

Keep up the cross posting and you'll make a few more. Mr. Thorson, if
you have anything to say to me, you'll say it without cross posting,
or else you won't get an answer. In an web article about Usenet usage
and customs, one of the single most disliked acts of the internet
abuser is the cross-post. Get smart, Pharma Boy, your cross posting
hurts your credibility,

Dave



.