Re: Well, Now we know
- From: wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David Wright)
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:27:13 GMT
In article <1191072633.944303.130920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<jurimed2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 29, 5:41 am, mainframetech <flam...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Children! Children! All this muck flying everywhere! The subject
is alternative health, not your various legal arguments. Try
disagreeing on the subjects the forum is titled for. It appears to me
you have all been marching around in the emperor's new clothes.
You can use logic, common sense and various proofs to make your
point. But this business of slapping each other with whatever is
available really isn't interesting to many people. Maybe the intent
is to scare people away so they will not learn of new or alternative
therapies?
C'mon folks. Take it somewhere else.
Chris
Chris:
Very good points you made. Maybe it is time this list is "fully
moderated."
And who, pray tell, would be the moderator?
The "quackbuster" function on these lists, I think, is to make them as
horrible place as possible, so that when a new person shows up they
can drive them away from altmed with violent, crazy talk.
Aw, Timmie, are you not getting the unquestioning adulation you so
desperately want? That's a shame.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"[Republicans] talk about Reagan the way gay guys talk about
Barbra Streisand." -- Bill Maher
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well, Now we know
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Well, Now we know
- References:
- Well, Now we know
- From: mainframetech
- Re: Well, Now we know
- From: jurimed2
- Well, Now we know
- Prev by Date: Re: Advanced Homeopathy
- Next by Date: Re: Should terminally ill patients have the right to take potentially unsafe drugs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Well, Now we know
- Next by thread: Re: Well, Now we know
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|