Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 03:44:47 -0500
"Mark Thorson" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4645243A.E193B792@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"msmith2911@xxxxxxxxx" wrote:
I'm quite fair minded...I do not respect people that
spend unbelievable amounts of time posting in newsgroups,
linking people's quotes and harassing others to no end.
It serves no purpose, and wastes life's precious time.
No, you are not fair-minded at all. If you
were, you would oppose those who START these
flame wars, rather than attacking the victims
of them.
You want me to stop defending myself for the
simple reason that my defenses are effective.
That's why I bother you so. When I post my
files to expose Jan's record of lying, bigotry,
and hate, no rational person can deny the
accuracy of my files. If they have any doubt,
they can follow the links I provide to her
original statements.
I certainly will continue to defend myself
whenever I'm attacked. Contrary to what
you seem to believe, it takes almost no effort
at all. The files have already been written,
and I intend to get the maximum milage
from them.
If Jan doesn't want to see them anymore,
she can stop making vicious, lying attacks
on people. But that would be like expecting
a toad to stop croaking.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/115abbd83ce3c0ba
From: Jan (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: In Mark Thorson's World
Quoting:
During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and
other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I
now
retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.
The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath
Lake,
produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized
as
addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin
because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users.
I
have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would
disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super
Blue
Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a
Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.
Yet he claims he didn't lie.
Therefore using this logic, I could plaster all over the net:
Mark Thorson *deliberately* molests children.
In *my* world, I would never so such a thing, *characterize* with no basis.
simply because having no basis is : something on which something else is
established or based, which means I made it up. In *MY world* this is L Y I
N
G.
Cell Tech states:
One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication
regarding
anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet sites.
Cell
Tech sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about Cell Tech,
its
products and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups. Cell
Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the
settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement that
appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been
widely
circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct statement,
undo
all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate.
Now, if I were to plaster all over the net, Mark Thorson *deliberately*
molests
children, and this no basis statement were believed, it would more than
likely
greatly damage Mark's reputation, most likely lose his job, and most likely
cause personal problems for his family.
AFTER that happened, I could whistle a tune, saying, I had no basis for my
*characterization*, I had no basis for my *suggestions*, I hereby retract
in
full.
It would be a bit late, but what the hey, I didn't lie.
===========
Because I have pointed this out, Mark repeats the lying and makes all kinds
of
garbage posts about me. He has no basis for those either.
In short, Mark didn't learn from his mistakes and has a huge problem, and
still
repeats his mistakes, never learning it's past time to *shut up*
Jan
.
- References:
- Re: Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: PeterB
- Re: Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Mark Probert
- Re:The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: msmith2911@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: msmith2911@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: msmith2911@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Mark Thorson
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: msmith2911@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Mark Thorson
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: msmith2911@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- From: Mark Thorson
- Re: Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- Prev by Date: Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- Next by Date: Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- Previous by thread: Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- Next by thread: Re: The FACTS of Mark Probert's disbarrment (was) Scientific basis of Alternative medicines
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|