Re: Amalgams victims need medical treatment

Mike wrote:

Mark Thorson wrote:
Mike wrote:
Let's look at your "demolition". You quote:
***************************************************
Dr. Otto Warburg received the Nobel prize in 1931
for the discovery that unlike all other cells
in the human body, cancer cells do not breathe
oxygen. Cancer cells are anaerobic, which means
that they derive their energy without needing oxygen.
***************************************************

You simply declare it "baloney" without explanation.

Unfortunately for you Dr. Warburg indeed got the Nobel prize
in 1931. And yes, it was his idea that cancer cells are
anaerobic. So, where is baloney?


Warburg did win the Nobel Prize in 1931, but not
for "the discovery that unlike all other cells in
the human body, cancer cells do not breathe oxygen".

If he did, why does the word "cancer" not appear
in his Nobel lecture:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1931/warburg-lecture.pdf


In the presentation speech by Professor E. Hammarsten,
member of the Nobel Committee for Physiology or
Medicine of the Royal Caroline Institute, the reason
for giving Warburg the prize is clearly stated:

"Your discovery about the nature and effect of the
ferment of respiration, which the Caroline Institute
is rewarding this year with Alfred Nobel's Prize for
Physiology or Medicine, has added a link of brilliant
achievement to the chain that binds for all time,
John Mayow (England), Antoine Laurent Lavoisier
(France), and Otto Warburg (Germany). On behalf of
the Caroline Institute I invite you to accept the
prize from the hands of our King."


You conveniently omitted the preceding sentence:

************************************************
The medical world expects great things from your experiments on cancer
and other tumours, experiments which seem already to be sufficiently far
advanced to be able to furnish an explanation for at least one cause of
the destructive and unlimited growth of these tumours.
************************************************

But that's not what he won the Nobel Prize for,
which is the claim that I refuted.
.

Relevant Pages