Re: Do Pharmabloggers Dream of Electric Homeopaths? (Or Rozilla vs. PeteyB)


"cathyb" <cathybeesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1157672970.787027.8160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<snip mention of name>

Rosalind reposted Richey's repeated lying websites and spam.

Which tells much about her.......................

Deleted!

Rich wrote:
<snip>

Perhaps not, but they are not so stupid as to spend real money any venue
as
insignificant as mha. Face it; what you an I write here has no impact
whatsoever on the big picture. All the newsgroups combined do not add up
to
a single pixel in that big picture, and the guys in the big pharma
boardrooms probably don't know or care that newsgroups exist.

Rich, that's just plain mean. Petey has an awful lot invested in
thinking that he's important enough to have people being paid to reply
to his puerile nonsense, and if you keep this up the people that he
works for might actually stop paying him to make an ass of himself by
plagiarising whale.to, making unbelievably stupid comments about maths
and chemistry, and failing to understand the few studies he cites.

For what its worth, I think the funniest post in the last year was
Petey's, and the group gets a lot of laughs out of him. I mean you
don't get many more laughs per word than when he posted this brave
missive to

, I suspect you are beginning to see what's going on here. I have

to play by their rules, as otherwise it's impossible to effectively
communicate here. I continue pointing out cathys past errors because
in order to combat the assault on natural medicine, you have to
discredit the discreditors. I'm expendable. They try to make it about

*

PeterB "








It's certainly not illegal, but in my view, it's unethical. No one
said that such efforts are about direct marketing, or even product
sales. As you well know, mind share is the bed rock of customer
loyalty, and that's got nothing to do with conspiracy theory. But nice
try.

, some kind of a secret industry guild that is cutting
our paychecks for the common good. Well, there's no such thing,
because
it
still wouldn't make sense to pay all that money to that many posters
to
(maybe) change the opinions of a dozen or so mha readers.

It's not about changing opinions, it's about changes in trend. If you
think I'm here to change minds, you're not paying attention. I thought
you were smarter than that.

Word it however you like, no "front group" or "consortium," is going to
pay
me and a half dozen others thirty bucks an hour to post here for the
minimal
"changes in trend" that might result. Just what is a "change in trend,"
anyway, if not altering opinions. And what is the difference between
"front
groups" and "consortiums" operating in "essential" stealth, and, say, a
conspiracy? You're full of it, Petey. Nobody gets paid to post here
other
than the occasional MLM marketer, and mha is probably not particularly
profitable even for them.
--


--Rich



.

Relevant Pages
Loading