Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- From: "PeterB" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Sep 2006 12:17:44 -0700
Vernon wrote:
"D. C. Sessions" <dcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:o8d0t3-slr.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In message <kvmdnWGo-LkxaGHZnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert wrote:
If amalgam is so bad, why haven't the thousands of us who have had them
for many years been showing terrible symptoms and dying off? How can you
know more than the ADA and most dentists?
You're a perfect example of the enormous neurological harm
that amalgam causes. If you still had normal mental functions,
you'd be posting lucid, reasoned, and factually correct messages
like John Scudamore and Jan Drew.
Your logic is proof positive that it isn't mercury / amalgam.
hehe. Then again, only a small percentage of smokers actually get lung
cancer. I suggest we all test the theory out and ask for more mercury
in our teeth, then spit it out or cough it up as we compare notes in
another 50 years.
PeterB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- From: jill999999
- Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- From: Vernon
- Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- References:
- Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- From: Vernon
- Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- Prev by Date: Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- Next by Date: Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- Previous by thread: Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- Next by thread: Re: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading