Re: Revici was right...and Darwin was wrong


Rich wrote:
<awthrawthr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151537926.303095.267640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The linked website provides solid evidence of the validity of Revici's
Theory of Evolution otherwise known as Hierarchic Organization.

Oftentimes, in any controversy there is evidence on either side. But
every once in a while, along comes irrefutable proof that resolves the
argument. Such is the case with the Grayfield microscope, a German
microscope that can show a LIVING VIRUS!

The website has a downloadable video (if you have a highspeed
connection) of a LIVING VIRUS in LIVING COLOR transforming into a
bacteria. Revici said viruses transformed into bacteria as an
evolutionary process, and that bacteria had a natural defense against
viruses.

With this microscope, Darwinianism is dead. (No aspersion against
Charles Darwin is intended...he was a sincere investigator...and there
is no shame in being incorrect.)

Revici was right. Again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grayfield technology is like Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), but in
color and with variable depth of field, without the need for coatings
or vacuums. Now you can monitor live tissue under the microscope with
magnifications in excess of 25,000 times with a resolution of better
than 100nm with variable depth of field, with sharp contours.

Benefits of real life microscopy
While other microscopes at such high resolutions deliver images in an
unnatural, black and white, Grayfield technology provides the
researcher:
real (natural) color.

Please view our online video, or order the DVD from the Grayfield Store
to really see for yourself, the exceptional images capable with these
Grayfield Technology devices.

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice,
in practice there is"

http://www.Grayfieldoptical.com


The claim of imaging objects the size of viruses in "natural color" violates
the laws of physics. "Color" is a property of visible light, and since the
wavelengths of visible light are at least fifty times or so larger than the
claimed 100nm resolution of the microscope you are spamming, no "natural
color" is possible. In other words, viruses have no color, and "color" is a
meaningless term at that size. As for a virus trasnforming into a bacterium,
that would be the equivalent of a mosquito transforming into an elephant.
There is a HUGE difference in size between viruses and bacteria.

At least you got that right...viruses are much smaller than
bacteria...and that doesn't change a thing because the virus transforms
by adding neucleoproteins and fatty acids.

Sorry, but your post is unbelievable, and if any of it were true, it would
be bigger news in the scientific world than the discovery of a new
continent.

We're not interested in your stinkin' theory about how it 'should be.'
You are right again in that it is a huge discovery...a discovery that
sinks the Darwinists theories with a nuclear bomb. And the video leaves
no doubt about it.

It shows a virus becoming a bacteria. It's obvious from your comments
that you didn't look at the video. No...you couldn't do that because it
would fracture your world view...Revici was right. The microscope helps
to demonstrate it. Case closed.

.

Relevant Pages