Re: Double question.
- From: "Coleah" <coleah@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:24:23 -0500
"vernon" <there@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:443bb67e$0$21553$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
smarter
"PeterB" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144759615.673232.284800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rich wrote:
"vernon" <there@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:443ae7af$0$6680$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"PeterB" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144700482.892434.19530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There is a great deal they don't know. Just look at the set of
responses you received here from people here who pretend to be
answerthan you.
I have quite a few on block, so I don't see some responses. I'm here
ot
learn
LOL! Vern is here to LEARN! Of course he qualifies, "Please don't
hopedif
you do not believe in . . ."
Why should he invite your predictable derogatory rebuttals and personal
attacks? That's why no one cares to hear what you have to say.
Interesting, the "constructive" responses.
Actually I used the word "believe" on purpose. Actual information was
for. You posted what you knew, thanks.N.G.
It must be some sort of mental illness for individuals to come to this
with the only purpose being to deny anything proposed.
A sweeping generality....
(it sounds like Vernon sobered up this morning)
Some cogent individuals may have a different application or view or actual
information on various alternative methods or basics.
Like Vernon making wild assed statements about knowing places where ADHD
people can get paid big bucks for doing nothing, producing no results and
being accountable to no one?....horses ass.
.
- References:
- Double question.
- From: vernon
- Re: Double question.
- From: PeterB
- Re: Double question.
- From: vernon
- Re: Double question.
- From: PeterB
- Re: Double question.
- From: vernon
- Re: Double question.
- From: Rich
- Re: Double question.
- From: PeterB
- Re: Double question.
- From: vernon
- Double question.
- Prev by Date: Re: Double question.
- Next by Date: Novel Device Shows Potential in Better Detecting Oral Cancer
- Previous by thread: Re: Double question.
- Next by thread: Re: Double question.
- Index(es):