Re: Double question.


"PeterB" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144759615.673232.284800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Rich wrote:
"vernon" <there@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:443ae7af$0$6680$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"PeterB" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144700482.892434.19530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


There is a great deal they don't know. Just look at the set of
responses you received here from people here who pretend to be smarter
than you.

I have quite a few on block, so I don't see some responses. I'm here
ot
learn

LOL! Vern is here to LEARN! Of course he qualifies, "Please don't answer
if
you do not believe in . . ."

Why should he invite your predictable derogatory rebuttals and personal
attacks? That's why no one cares to hear what you have to say.



Interesting, the "constructive" responses.
Actually I used the word "believe" on purpose. Actual information was hoped
for. You posted what you knew, thanks.
It must be some sort of mental illness for individuals to come to this N.G.
with the only purpose being to deny anything proposed.
Some cogent individuals may have a different application or view or actual
information on various alternative methods or basics. One would swear these
people are paid by AMA or Pharms to be rabble rousers. It is difficult to
believe that either would deal with (pay for) such ignorance, thus weakening
their intent.


.

Quantcast